Flash for group photos near wall Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteWhat is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?How to take photos of large groups (over 100 people)?How to meter for manual bounce flash?What is the smallest option for a flash that can also bounce?How to avoid shadows under the eyes when using bounce flash?Can I get a high quality image from a rostrum mounted camera and bounce flash?Capturing the full effect of iridescent/“holo” nail polishWhy are some photos gray and dark in my lightbox?How can I avoid reflections in windows when using flash?How can I avoid dark horizontal lines (stripes or bands) with LED lighting?Lighting the inside of an incubator

Does Feeblemind produce an ongoing magical effect that can be dispelled?

Do I need to protect SFP ports and optics from dust/contaminants? If so, how?

What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?

How to keep bees out of canned beverages?

How do I check if a string is entirely made of the same substring?

Could Neutrino technically as side-effect, incentivize centralization of the bitcoin network?

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space many times as possible so that it loose lot of kinetic energy over there?

How to find the right literary agent in the USA?

Error: Syntax error. Missing ')' for CASE Statement

Can you stand up from being prone using Skirmisher outside of your turn?

SQL Query not selecting all points that it should?

Is accepting an invalid credit card number a security issue?

Does Mathematica have an implementation of the Poisson Binomial Distribution?

How would I use different systems of magic when they are capable of the same effects?

std::is_constructible on incomplete types

Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring

What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?

Does the set of sets which are elements of every set exist?

Israeli soda type drink

Multiple fireplaces in an apartment building?

Would reducing the reference voltage of an ADC have any effect on accuracy?

How to open locks without disable device?

Why does the Cisco show run command not show the full version, while the show version command does?

The art of proof summarizing. Are there known rules, or is it a purely common sense matter?



Flash for group photos near wall



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteWhat is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?How to take photos of large groups (over 100 people)?How to meter for manual bounce flash?What is the smallest option for a flash that can also bounce?How to avoid shadows under the eyes when using bounce flash?Can I get a high quality image from a rostrum mounted camera and bounce flash?Capturing the full effect of iridescent/“holo” nail polishWhy are some photos gray and dark in my lightbox?How can I avoid reflections in windows when using flash?How can I avoid dark horizontal lines (stripes or bands) with LED lighting?Lighting the inside of an incubator



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I'm having trouble geting nice even lighting when using my speelight on my camera. I photographed a formal recently in a hall with high yellowish callings. I pointed the speelight directly upwards at the ceiling to diffuse the light. However in many of my photos, especially those near walls, the light would be very bright near the top and dim near the bottom. What could I do to avoid this? Example photo below. Thanks
Group photo










share|improve this question







New contributor




Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


























    2















    I'm having trouble geting nice even lighting when using my speelight on my camera. I photographed a formal recently in a hall with high yellowish callings. I pointed the speelight directly upwards at the ceiling to diffuse the light. However in many of my photos, especially those near walls, the light would be very bright near the top and dim near the bottom. What could I do to avoid this? Example photo below. Thanks
    Group photo










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      2












      2








      2








      I'm having trouble geting nice even lighting when using my speelight on my camera. I photographed a formal recently in a hall with high yellowish callings. I pointed the speelight directly upwards at the ceiling to diffuse the light. However in many of my photos, especially those near walls, the light would be very bright near the top and dim near the bottom. What could I do to avoid this? Example photo below. Thanks
      Group photo










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I'm having trouble geting nice even lighting when using my speelight on my camera. I photographed a formal recently in a hall with high yellowish callings. I pointed the speelight directly upwards at the ceiling to diffuse the light. However in many of my photos, especially those near walls, the light would be very bright near the top and dim near the bottom. What could I do to avoid this? Example photo below. Thanks
      Group photo







      flash lighting bounce-flash






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 3 hours ago









      Geoff Shaw PhotographyGeoff Shaw Photography

      111




      111




      New contributor




      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).



          If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.



          If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.



          If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)






          share|improve this answer























          • Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

            – xiota
            10 mins ago


















          1














          Options to consider:



          • Use diffusor in addition to the bouce.

          • Change angle of bounce.

          • Try bouncing off nearby walls.

          • Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.

          • Umbrellas and soft boxes?

          The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.



          • Create layer with black to white gradient matching change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall.

          • Find an appropriate layer blending mode (I'd try overlay or soft light).

          • Change opacity to taste.

          There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.






          share|improve this answer






























            1














            You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.



            Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.



            If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.



            You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "61"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );






              Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107809%2fflash-for-group-photos-near-wall%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2














              In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).



              If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.



              If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.



              If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)






              share|improve this answer























              • Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

                – xiota
                10 mins ago















              2














              In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).



              If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.



              If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.



              If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)






              share|improve this answer























              • Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

                – xiota
                10 mins ago













              2












              2








              2







              In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).



              If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.



              If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.



              If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)






              share|improve this answer













              In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).



              If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.



              If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.



              If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 2 hours ago









              HuecoHueco

              12.6k32858




              12.6k32858












              • Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

                – xiota
                10 mins ago

















              • Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

                – xiota
                10 mins ago
















              Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

              – xiota
              10 mins ago





              Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

              – xiota
              10 mins ago













              1














              Options to consider:



              • Use diffusor in addition to the bouce.

              • Change angle of bounce.

              • Try bouncing off nearby walls.

              • Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.

              • Umbrellas and soft boxes?

              The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.



              • Create layer with black to white gradient matching change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall.

              • Find an appropriate layer blending mode (I'd try overlay or soft light).

              • Change opacity to taste.

              There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.






              share|improve this answer



























                1














                Options to consider:



                • Use diffusor in addition to the bouce.

                • Change angle of bounce.

                • Try bouncing off nearby walls.

                • Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.

                • Umbrellas and soft boxes?

                The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.



                • Create layer with black to white gradient matching change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall.

                • Find an appropriate layer blending mode (I'd try overlay or soft light).

                • Change opacity to taste.

                There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.






                share|improve this answer

























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  Options to consider:



                  • Use diffusor in addition to the bouce.

                  • Change angle of bounce.

                  • Try bouncing off nearby walls.

                  • Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.

                  • Umbrellas and soft boxes?

                  The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.



                  • Create layer with black to white gradient matching change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall.

                  • Find an appropriate layer blending mode (I'd try overlay or soft light).

                  • Change opacity to taste.

                  There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Options to consider:



                  • Use diffusor in addition to the bouce.

                  • Change angle of bounce.

                  • Try bouncing off nearby walls.

                  • Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.

                  • Umbrellas and soft boxes?

                  The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.



                  • Create layer with black to white gradient matching change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall.

                  • Find an appropriate layer blending mode (I'd try overlay or soft light).

                  • Change opacity to taste.

                  There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  xiotaxiota

                  12.3k41864




                  12.3k41864





















                      1














                      You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.



                      Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.



                      If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.



                      You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).






                      share|improve this answer



























                        1














                        You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.



                        Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.



                        If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.



                        You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).






                        share|improve this answer

























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.



                          Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.



                          If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.



                          You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).






                          share|improve this answer













                          You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.



                          Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.



                          If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.



                          You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 24 mins ago









                          inkistainkista

                          41.3k562107




                          41.3k562107




















                              Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                              Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107809%2fflash-for-group-photos-near-wall%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

                              2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

                              Metrô de Los Teques Índice Linhas | Estações | Ver também | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegação«INSTITUCIÓN»«Mapa de rutas»originalMetrô de Los TequesC.A. Metro Los Teques |Alcaldía de Guaicaipuro – Sitio OficialGobernacion de Mirandaeeeeeee