Why is law of evidence nonchalantlly translated in the Greek language as law of proof instead of law of indications?How does the US legal system prevent successful evidence tampering from reducing total punishment?What the prosecutor need to proof to proof blasphemy case in Ahok caseCan DNA on drugs be used as evidence even if the drugs weren't in anyone's possession at the time it was found? (Canada)Why would a Canadian Crown Prosecutor continue with a proceeding with no evidence?What is involved (other than financial + evidence aspects) in bringing a private prosecution in the UK?Why does double jeopardy apply even when the acquittal was due to insufficiency of evidence?Why was video evidence released after the trial ended in the Daniel Shaver murder case?Why did the DA choose to prosecute the mother instead of the bully?Can an email to a 3rd party be admitted as an evidence in the court? (Family Law UK)If police collected evidence based off of a call they suspected, but couldn't prove, was fruadulant would the evidence be upheld?
Multi tool use
New order #4: World
whey we use polarized capacitor?
TGV timetables / schedules?
Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?
Copenhagen passport control - US citizen
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?
Should I join office cleaning event for free?
Compute hash value according to multiplication method
How to type dʒ symbol (IPA) on Mac?
Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
Set-theoretical foundations of Mathematics with only bounded quantifiers
How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
Patience, young "Padovan"
Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?
What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?
How is it possible for user to changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)
Can a German sentence have two subjects?
"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it
Modification to Chariots for Heavy Cavalry Analogue for 4-armed race
The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server
Why CLRS example on residual networks does not follows its formula?
Why is law of evidence nonchalantlly translated in the Greek language as law of proof instead of law of indications?
How does the US legal system prevent successful evidence tampering from reducing total punishment?What the prosecutor need to proof to proof blasphemy case in Ahok caseCan DNA on drugs be used as evidence even if the drugs weren't in anyone's possession at the time it was found? (Canada)Why would a Canadian Crown Prosecutor continue with a proceeding with no evidence?What is involved (other than financial + evidence aspects) in bringing a private prosecution in the UK?Why does double jeopardy apply even when the acquittal was due to insufficiency of evidence?Why was video evidence released after the trial ended in the Daniel Shaver murder case?Why did the DA choose to prosecute the mother instead of the bully?Can an email to a 3rd party be admitted as an evidence in the court? (Family Law UK)If police collected evidence based off of a call they suspected, but couldn't prove, was fruadulant would the evidence be upheld?
Απόδειξη(From + Show) and Ένδειξη(In or With + Show) are the main choices Ανάδειξη(Above or Again + Show), Επίδειξη(To + Show), Υπόδειξη(Under or Because + Show), Κατάδειξη(Against + Show) are the other ones.
I am much more confortable with a judge deciding based on indications that can make mistakes and therefore is also responsible for them than a philosophically and semantically infallible omniscient judge.
Is it not a problem to consider any affirmation in a court a proof?
If 2 opposing affirmations are made in a court and we consider both proofs what happens with logic? We have a contradiction. A is true, B is also true but A¬B.
A proof does not have power. Evidence and indication have power. How intensely they point somewhere.
In mathematics, statistics, physics, economics, chemistry, engineering etc we have proofs only because he have the raw materials to produce the proofs.
We have axioms, definitions, hypotheses(Let A) and they all have a philosophical cost they cannot be proven and we must incur these costs if we want to prove anything else.
How can we call Law of Evidence Law of Proof?
criminal-law contract-law international evidence rules-of-court
asked 8 mins ago
George NtoulosGeorge Ntoulos
1
New contributor
George Ntoulos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Απόδειξη(From + Show) and Ένδειξη(In or With + Show) are the main choices Ανάδειξη(Above or Again + Show), Επίδειξη(To + Show), Υπόδειξη(Under or Because + Show), Κατάδειξη(Against + Show) are the other ones.
I am much more confortable with a judge deciding based on indications that can make mistakes and therefore is also responsible for them than a philosophically and semantically infallible omniscient judge.
Is it not a problem to consider any affirmation in a court a proof?
If 2 opposing affirmations are made in a court and we consider both proofs what happens with logic? We have a contradiction. A is true, B is also true but A¬B.
A proof does not have power. Evidence and indication have power. How intensely they point somewhere.
In mathematics, statistics, physics, economics, chemistry, engineering etc we have proofs only because he have the raw materials to produce the proofs.
We have axioms, definitions, hypotheses(Let A) and they all have a philosophical cost they cannot be proven and we must incur these costs if we want to prove anything else.
How can we call Law of Evidence Law of Proof?
criminal-law contract-law international evidence rules-of-court
asked 8 mins ago
George NtoulosGeorge Ntoulos
1
New contributor
George Ntoulos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Απόδειξη(From + Show) and Ένδειξη(In or With + Show) are the main choices Ανάδειξη(Above or Again + Show), Επίδειξη(To + Show), Υπόδειξη(Under or Because + Show), Κατάδειξη(Against + Show) are the other ones.
I am much more confortable with a judge deciding based on indications that can make mistakes and therefore is also responsible for them than a philosophically and semantically infallible omniscient judge.
Is it not a problem to consider any affirmation in a court a proof?
If 2 opposing affirmations are made in a court and we consider both proofs what happens with logic? We have a contradiction. A is true, B is also true but A¬B.
A proof does not have power. Evidence and indication have power. How intensely they point somewhere.
In mathematics, statistics, physics, economics, chemistry, engineering etc we have proofs only because he have the raw materials to produce the proofs.
We have axioms, definitions, hypotheses(Let A) and they all have a philosophical cost they cannot be proven and we must incur these costs if we want to prove anything else.
How can we call Law of Evidence Law of Proof?
criminal-law contract-law international evidence rules-of-court
asked 8 mins ago
George NtoulosGeorge Ntoulos
1
New contributor
George Ntoulos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Απόδειξη(From + Show) and Ένδειξη(In or With + Show) are the main choices Ανάδειξη(Above or Again + Show), Επίδειξη(To + Show), Υπόδειξη(Under or Because + Show), Κατάδειξη(Against + Show) are the other ones.
I am much more confortable with a judge deciding based on indications that can make mistakes and therefore is also responsible for them than a philosophically and semantically infallible omniscient judge.
Is it not a problem to consider any affirmation in a court a proof?
If 2 opposing affirmations are made in a court and we consider both proofs what happens with logic? We have a contradiction. A is true, B is also true but A¬B.
A proof does not have power. Evidence and indication have power. How intensely they point somewhere.
In mathematics, statistics, physics, economics, chemistry, engineering etc we have proofs only because he have the raw materials to produce the proofs.
We have axioms, definitions, hypotheses(Let A) and they all have a philosophical cost they cannot be proven and we must incur these costs if we want to prove anything else.
How can we call Law of Evidence Law of Proof?
criminal-law contract-law international evidence rules-of-court
criminal-law contract-law international evidence rules-of-court
asked 8 mins ago
George NtoulosGeorge Ntoulos
1
New contributor
George Ntoulos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 mins ago
George NtoulosGeorge Ntoulos
1
New contributor
George Ntoulos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 mins ago
George NtoulosGeorge Ntoulos
1
New contributor
George Ntoulos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 mins ago
George NtoulosGeorge Ntoulos
1
asked 8 mins ago
George NtoulosGeorge Ntoulos
1
1
New contributor
George Ntoulos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
George Ntoulos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
George Ntoulos is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
George Ntoulos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38902%2fwhy-is-law-of-evidence-nonchalantlly-translated-in-the-greek-language-as-law-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
George Ntoulos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
George Ntoulos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
George Ntoulos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
George Ntoulos is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38902%2fwhy-is-law-of-evidence-nonchalantlly-translated-in-the-greek-language-as-law-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
gCm6O41SdW,pKbtwSauoe14n4o,Co6kfbqShZdrlyDwPahENYogy3j6Edz06iMLuGeIlTRsKs6WDwZydK o 22JHzQyml U8sVw
