Why use ultrasound for medical imaging? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is there an upper frequency limit to ultrasound?How is it possible for an Ultrasound device to correctly interpret a negative density change in tissue?How specifically does an MRI machine build an image from received radio wavesIs it possible to send modulated ultrasound wave from underwater to air?Why the Doppler Ultrasound beam needs to be looking directly down at a pipeIntensity of an ultrasound beam?Dynamic range of ultrasound machine expressed in dBUltrasound wave/beam generationDoppler effect of sound waves in bloodAveraging speed of ultrasound between two differnt boundaires
What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?
Hiding Certain Lines on Table
Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?
Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?
"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?
What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?
Program that generates brainfuck code that outputs given text
Typeface like Times New Roman but with "tied" percent sign
Can the prologue be the backstory of your main character?
Simulating Exploding Dice
What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
When did F become S in typeography, and why?
Segmentation fault output is suppressed when piping stdin into a function. Why?
Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive
Wall plug outlet change
Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?
Difference between "generating set" and free product?
What's the point in a preamp?
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached
How to split app screen on my Mac?
Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?
Why use ultrasound for medical imaging?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is there an upper frequency limit to ultrasound?How is it possible for an Ultrasound device to correctly interpret a negative density change in tissue?How specifically does an MRI machine build an image from received radio wavesIs it possible to send modulated ultrasound wave from underwater to air?Why the Doppler Ultrasound beam needs to be looking directly down at a pipeIntensity of an ultrasound beam?Dynamic range of ultrasound machine expressed in dBUltrasound wave/beam generationDoppler effect of sound waves in bloodAveraging speed of ultrasound between two differnt boundaires
$begingroup$
What advantage does ultrasound have over sound between 20-20000Hz that it is used in medical imaging over sound in that frequency range?
energy acoustics frequency wavelength medical-physics
edited 9 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001245
asked 9 hours ago
Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan
30311
New contributor
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What advantage does ultrasound have over sound between 20-20000Hz that it is used in medical imaging over sound in that frequency range?
energy acoustics frequency wavelength medical-physics
edited 9 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001245
asked 9 hours ago
Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan
30311
New contributor
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Homework-like question, lack of effort.
$endgroup$
– Pieter
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
you have a point, I’ll try to stop posting trivial questions from now on
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What advantage does ultrasound have over sound between 20-20000Hz that it is used in medical imaging over sound in that frequency range?
energy acoustics frequency wavelength medical-physics
edited 9 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001245
asked 9 hours ago
Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan
30311
New contributor
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
What advantage does ultrasound have over sound between 20-20000Hz that it is used in medical imaging over sound in that frequency range?
energy acoustics frequency wavelength medical-physics
energy acoustics frequency wavelength medical-physics
edited 9 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001245
asked 9 hours ago
Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan
30311
New contributor
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 9 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001245
asked 9 hours ago
Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan
30311
New contributor
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 9 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001245
edited 9 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001245
edited 9 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
108k122001245
108k122001245
asked 9 hours ago
Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan
30311
New contributor
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 hours ago
Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan
30311
asked 9 hours ago
Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan
30311
30311
New contributor
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Homework-like question, lack of effort.
$endgroup$
– Pieter
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
you have a point, I’ll try to stop posting trivial questions from now on
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Homework-like question, lack of effort.
$endgroup$
– Pieter
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
you have a point, I’ll try to stop posting trivial questions from now on
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Homework-like question, lack of effort.
$endgroup$
– Pieter
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Homework-like question, lack of effort.
$endgroup$
– Pieter
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
you have a point, I’ll try to stop posting trivial questions from now on
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
you have a point, I’ll try to stop posting trivial questions from now on
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think the simple answer here is resolution.
Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.
If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by
$$lambda = c over f $$
so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....
The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate
$$lambda = 0.001 rm m = 1 rm mm$$
At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm
answered 9 hours ago
tomtom
6,42711627
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using waves for imaging, you want to distinguish points in the specimen. Consider the simplest case: you'd like to distinguish 2 discs (or spheres).
The waves are coming from behind the specimen passing through the circle or the waves are reflected on the circle. Considering the phase relationship of the waves at the detector (i.e. investigating interference) because of the diffraction on the 1 circle, even with focusing, one cannot get a single point on the detector. Take a look on the single slit diffraction and on the 2D version, on the Airy disk.
On the focused image you will get concentric circles. For $alpha$, the angular distance between the two most visible, inner ones one gets
$$lambda /left( 2d right) = sin left( alpha right) approx alpha ,$$
where $lambda$ corresponds to the wavelength and $d$ is the size of disc (therefore, your discs cannot be closer than this). With a huge, $180^circ$ imaging device one can resolve a distance of $lambda/2$. It can be seen that the achievable resolution (resolvable smallest distance) is proportional to wavelength.
And as it is known,
$$lambda = c/f,$$
where $c$ is the speed of the wave and $f$ is frequency, the higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength is, increasing the achievable resolution.
Estimation
You can make an estimation on the achievable resolution. You'd like to do measurements in a human body. That consists of water mainly, the speed of sound in the water is $1500m/s$. At $20textKHz$ the resolvable distance is
$$frac1500textm/texts2 cdot 20textkHz = 3.75textcm.$$
We considered only 2D imaging here, but similar applies to 3D where you'd like to get information in 3D. In 3D one measures the time difference between the emission and detection of the signal, and using the $v=s/t$ formula, the distance of the object can be calculated.
answered 8 hours ago
DanielTuzesDanielTuzes
21816
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Higher frequency provides higher resolution.
answered 9 hours ago
akhmeteliakhmeteli
18.5k21844
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472565%2fwhy-use-ultrasound-for-medical-imaging%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think the simple answer here is resolution.
Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.
If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by
$$lambda = c over f $$
so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....
The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate
$$lambda = 0.001 rm m = 1 rm mm$$
At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm
answered 9 hours ago
tomtom
6,42711627
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the simple answer here is resolution.
Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.
If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by
$$lambda = c over f $$
so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....
The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate
$$lambda = 0.001 rm m = 1 rm mm$$
At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm
answered 9 hours ago
tomtom
6,42711627
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the simple answer here is resolution.
Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.
If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by
$$lambda = c over f $$
so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....
The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate
$$lambda = 0.001 rm m = 1 rm mm$$
At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm
answered 9 hours ago
tomtom
6,42711627
$endgroup$
I think the simple answer here is resolution.
Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.
If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by
$$lambda = c over f $$
so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....
The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate
$$lambda = 0.001 rm m = 1 rm mm$$
At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm
answered 9 hours ago
tomtom
6,42711627
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
tomtom
6,42711627
answered 9 hours ago
tomtom
6,42711627
answered 9 hours ago
tomtom
6,42711627
6,42711627
$begingroup$
Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using waves for imaging, you want to distinguish points in the specimen. Consider the simplest case: you'd like to distinguish 2 discs (or spheres).
The waves are coming from behind the specimen passing through the circle or the waves are reflected on the circle. Considering the phase relationship of the waves at the detector (i.e. investigating interference) because of the diffraction on the 1 circle, even with focusing, one cannot get a single point on the detector. Take a look on the single slit diffraction and on the 2D version, on the Airy disk.
On the focused image you will get concentric circles. For $alpha$, the angular distance between the two most visible, inner ones one gets
$$lambda /left( 2d right) = sin left( alpha right) approx alpha ,$$
where $lambda$ corresponds to the wavelength and $d$ is the size of disc (therefore, your discs cannot be closer than this). With a huge, $180^circ$ imaging device one can resolve a distance of $lambda/2$. It can be seen that the achievable resolution (resolvable smallest distance) is proportional to wavelength.
And as it is known,
$$lambda = c/f,$$
where $c$ is the speed of the wave and $f$ is frequency, the higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength is, increasing the achievable resolution.
Estimation
You can make an estimation on the achievable resolution. You'd like to do measurements in a human body. That consists of water mainly, the speed of sound in the water is $1500m/s$. At $20textKHz$ the resolvable distance is
$$frac1500textm/texts2 cdot 20textkHz = 3.75textcm.$$
We considered only 2D imaging here, but similar applies to 3D where you'd like to get information in 3D. In 3D one measures the time difference between the emission and detection of the signal, and using the $v=s/t$ formula, the distance of the object can be calculated.
answered 8 hours ago
DanielTuzesDanielTuzes
21816
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using waves for imaging, you want to distinguish points in the specimen. Consider the simplest case: you'd like to distinguish 2 discs (or spheres).
The waves are coming from behind the specimen passing through the circle or the waves are reflected on the circle. Considering the phase relationship of the waves at the detector (i.e. investigating interference) because of the diffraction on the 1 circle, even with focusing, one cannot get a single point on the detector. Take a look on the single slit diffraction and on the 2D version, on the Airy disk.
On the focused image you will get concentric circles. For $alpha$, the angular distance between the two most visible, inner ones one gets
$$lambda /left( 2d right) = sin left( alpha right) approx alpha ,$$
where $lambda$ corresponds to the wavelength and $d$ is the size of disc (therefore, your discs cannot be closer than this). With a huge, $180^circ$ imaging device one can resolve a distance of $lambda/2$. It can be seen that the achievable resolution (resolvable smallest distance) is proportional to wavelength.
And as it is known,
$$lambda = c/f,$$
where $c$ is the speed of the wave and $f$ is frequency, the higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength is, increasing the achievable resolution.
Estimation
You can make an estimation on the achievable resolution. You'd like to do measurements in a human body. That consists of water mainly, the speed of sound in the water is $1500m/s$. At $20textKHz$ the resolvable distance is
$$frac1500textm/texts2 cdot 20textkHz = 3.75textcm.$$
We considered only 2D imaging here, but similar applies to 3D where you'd like to get information in 3D. In 3D one measures the time difference between the emission and detection of the signal, and using the $v=s/t$ formula, the distance of the object can be calculated.
answered 8 hours ago
DanielTuzesDanielTuzes
21816
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using waves for imaging, you want to distinguish points in the specimen. Consider the simplest case: you'd like to distinguish 2 discs (or spheres).
The waves are coming from behind the specimen passing through the circle or the waves are reflected on the circle. Considering the phase relationship of the waves at the detector (i.e. investigating interference) because of the diffraction on the 1 circle, even with focusing, one cannot get a single point on the detector. Take a look on the single slit diffraction and on the 2D version, on the Airy disk.
On the focused image you will get concentric circles. For $alpha$, the angular distance between the two most visible, inner ones one gets
$$lambda /left( 2d right) = sin left( alpha right) approx alpha ,$$
where $lambda$ corresponds to the wavelength and $d$ is the size of disc (therefore, your discs cannot be closer than this). With a huge, $180^circ$ imaging device one can resolve a distance of $lambda/2$. It can be seen that the achievable resolution (resolvable smallest distance) is proportional to wavelength.
And as it is known,
$$lambda = c/f,$$
where $c$ is the speed of the wave and $f$ is frequency, the higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength is, increasing the achievable resolution.
Estimation
You can make an estimation on the achievable resolution. You'd like to do measurements in a human body. That consists of water mainly, the speed of sound in the water is $1500m/s$. At $20textKHz$ the resolvable distance is
$$frac1500textm/texts2 cdot 20textkHz = 3.75textcm.$$
We considered only 2D imaging here, but similar applies to 3D where you'd like to get information in 3D. In 3D one measures the time difference between the emission and detection of the signal, and using the $v=s/t$ formula, the distance of the object can be calculated.
answered 8 hours ago
DanielTuzesDanielTuzes
21816
$endgroup$
Using waves for imaging, you want to distinguish points in the specimen. Consider the simplest case: you'd like to distinguish 2 discs (or spheres).
The waves are coming from behind the specimen passing through the circle or the waves are reflected on the circle. Considering the phase relationship of the waves at the detector (i.e. investigating interference) because of the diffraction on the 1 circle, even with focusing, one cannot get a single point on the detector. Take a look on the single slit diffraction and on the 2D version, on the Airy disk.
On the focused image you will get concentric circles. For $alpha$, the angular distance between the two most visible, inner ones one gets
$$lambda /left( 2d right) = sin left( alpha right) approx alpha ,$$
where $lambda$ corresponds to the wavelength and $d$ is the size of disc (therefore, your discs cannot be closer than this). With a huge, $180^circ$ imaging device one can resolve a distance of $lambda/2$. It can be seen that the achievable resolution (resolvable smallest distance) is proportional to wavelength.
And as it is known,
$$lambda = c/f,$$
where $c$ is the speed of the wave and $f$ is frequency, the higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength is, increasing the achievable resolution.
Estimation
You can make an estimation on the achievable resolution. You'd like to do measurements in a human body. That consists of water mainly, the speed of sound in the water is $1500m/s$. At $20textKHz$ the resolvable distance is
$$frac1500textm/texts2 cdot 20textkHz = 3.75textcm.$$
We considered only 2D imaging here, but similar applies to 3D where you'd like to get information in 3D. In 3D one measures the time difference between the emission and detection of the signal, and using the $v=s/t$ formula, the distance of the object can be calculated.
answered 8 hours ago
DanielTuzesDanielTuzes
21816
edited 7 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
DanielTuzesDanielTuzes
21816
answered 8 hours ago
DanielTuzesDanielTuzes
21816
answered 8 hours ago
DanielTuzesDanielTuzes
21816
21816
$begingroup$
Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Higher frequency provides higher resolution.
answered 9 hours ago
akhmeteliakhmeteli
18.5k21844
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Higher frequency provides higher resolution.
answered 9 hours ago
akhmeteliakhmeteli
18.5k21844
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Higher frequency provides higher resolution.
answered 9 hours ago
akhmeteliakhmeteli
18.5k21844
$endgroup$
Higher frequency provides higher resolution.
answered 9 hours ago
akhmeteliakhmeteli
18.5k21844
answered 9 hours ago
akhmeteliakhmeteli
18.5k21844
answered 9 hours ago
akhmeteliakhmeteli
18.5k21844
answered 9 hours ago
akhmeteliakhmeteli
18.5k21844
18.5k21844
add a comment |
add a comment |
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472565%2fwhy-use-ultrasound-for-medical-imaging%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
$endgroup$
– dmckee♦
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Homework-like question, lack of effort.
$endgroup$
– Pieter
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
you have a point, I’ll try to stop posting trivial questions from now on
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
8 hours ago