DMCA disclaimer's impact on hosted materialDoes reviewing material added by users revoke my DMCA safe harbor?Legality of Proxy sites and DMCALegal issues of a website such as [businessname]sucks.comIs copyright infringement theft?Is Encrypted Intellectual Property still considered Intellectual Property?Is it illegal to make a website for watching dramas?Can I legally present data from public API's on a website?Do we have to take down the material for 14 days even if the DMCA notice is erroneous?Data copyright for public domain content or natural resourcesIs it allowed to “copy” a video game concept?
Awk syntax, strange variable?
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?
Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?
What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?
Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted
How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?
How long does it take to type this?
What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files
Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?
Should I join office cleaning event for free?
Is the month field really deprecated?
Patience, young "Padovan"
Why are only specific transaction types accepted into the mempool?
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
Shell script not opening as desktop application
If Manufacturer spice model and Datasheet give different values which should I use?
Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?
Find original functions from a composite function
Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
Why has Russell's definition of numbers using equivalence classes been finally abandoned? ( If it has actually been abandoned).
Representing power series as a function - what to do with the constant after integration?
Symplectic equivalent of commuting matrices
DMCA disclaimer's impact on hosted material
Does reviewing material added by users revoke my DMCA safe harbor?Legality of Proxy sites and DMCALegal issues of a website such as [businessname]sucks.comIs copyright infringement theft?Is Encrypted Intellectual Property still considered Intellectual Property?Is it illegal to make a website for watching dramas?Can I legally present data from public API's on a website?Do we have to take down the material for 14 days even if the DMCA notice is erroneous?Data copyright for public domain content or natural resourcesIs it allowed to “copy” a video game concept?
I've found a website that hosts a large number of data that is supposed to be publicly available. They've put this in their DMCA information page:
"The Eye (https://the-eye.eu/) respects the intellectual property rights of others. It is, therefore, site policy to expeditiously process, investigate and address notices of alleged infringement, and to take appropriate action under the DMCA and other relevant intellectual property laws.
If you believe that your work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement by any content or material on the site, please provide the following information in writing to the-eye.eu's Copyright Agent at dmca (at) the-eye (dot) eu"
Is this just some sort of a safe exit in the case of them hosting an illegal file? Or can I be sure that if I download some data I won't end up in jail?
Because browsing through their catalog of books, I could find famous ones such as the "For dummies" series (old versions, > 2018) or ones from the HumbleBundle website (there are which can be considered relatively recent too, 2016).
Do copyrights end after 2 or 3 years?
copyright dmca
add a comment |
I've found a website that hosts a large number of data that is supposed to be publicly available. They've put this in their DMCA information page:
"The Eye (https://the-eye.eu/) respects the intellectual property rights of others. It is, therefore, site policy to expeditiously process, investigate and address notices of alleged infringement, and to take appropriate action under the DMCA and other relevant intellectual property laws.
If you believe that your work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement by any content or material on the site, please provide the following information in writing to the-eye.eu's Copyright Agent at dmca (at) the-eye (dot) eu"
Is this just some sort of a safe exit in the case of them hosting an illegal file? Or can I be sure that if I download some data I won't end up in jail?
Because browsing through their catalog of books, I could find famous ones such as the "For dummies" series (old versions, > 2018) or ones from the HumbleBundle website (there are which can be considered relatively recent too, 2016).
Do copyrights end after 2 or 3 years?
copyright dmca
Please edit your title to make it clearer what your question is.
– Free Radical
May 21 '18 at 8:05
add a comment |
I've found a website that hosts a large number of data that is supposed to be publicly available. They've put this in their DMCA information page:
"The Eye (https://the-eye.eu/) respects the intellectual property rights of others. It is, therefore, site policy to expeditiously process, investigate and address notices of alleged infringement, and to take appropriate action under the DMCA and other relevant intellectual property laws.
If you believe that your work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement by any content or material on the site, please provide the following information in writing to the-eye.eu's Copyright Agent at dmca (at) the-eye (dot) eu"
Is this just some sort of a safe exit in the case of them hosting an illegal file? Or can I be sure that if I download some data I won't end up in jail?
Because browsing through their catalog of books, I could find famous ones such as the "For dummies" series (old versions, > 2018) or ones from the HumbleBundle website (there are which can be considered relatively recent too, 2016).
Do copyrights end after 2 or 3 years?
copyright dmca
I've found a website that hosts a large number of data that is supposed to be publicly available. They've put this in their DMCA information page:
"The Eye (https://the-eye.eu/) respects the intellectual property rights of others. It is, therefore, site policy to expeditiously process, investigate and address notices of alleged infringement, and to take appropriate action under the DMCA and other relevant intellectual property laws.
If you believe that your work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement by any content or material on the site, please provide the following information in writing to the-eye.eu's Copyright Agent at dmca (at) the-eye (dot) eu"
Is this just some sort of a safe exit in the case of them hosting an illegal file? Or can I be sure that if I download some data I won't end up in jail?
Because browsing through their catalog of books, I could find famous ones such as the "For dummies" series (old versions, > 2018) or ones from the HumbleBundle website (there are which can be considered relatively recent too, 2016).
Do copyrights end after 2 or 3 years?
copyright dmca
copyright dmca
edited May 21 '18 at 14:11
Jason Aller
1,09721431
1,09721431
asked May 21 '18 at 4:41
user18179
Please edit your title to make it clearer what your question is.
– Free Radical
May 21 '18 at 8:05
add a comment |
Please edit your title to make it clearer what your question is.
– Free Radical
May 21 '18 at 8:05
Please edit your title to make it clearer what your question is.
– Free Radical
May 21 '18 at 8:05
Please edit your title to make it clearer what your question is.
– Free Radical
May 21 '18 at 8:05
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Duration of copyright depends on the jurisdiction, but in many, including the EU, they last for 70 years after the death of the longest living creator, or for 70 years after creation if no individual creator can be identified.
As for the notice you quote, this is just standard DMCA stuff. Basically, the DMCA provides safe harbor (i.e. immunity to prosecution) for a site owner for copyright infringement until he is noticed about infringement. The notice you quote is a declaration that says that the site owner intends to comply with the DMCA notice and take-down procedure. This notice has no effect on your right or liabilities if you choose to dowload works from the site.
As for being punished for infringing copyright by downloading stuff from the Internet (including the site you link to - but too specific legal advice is off-topic here):
In the EU, downloading a work from the internet constitutes an act of reproduction and needs the authorisation of the rights holders, even if it is for personal and private use (in other jurisdictions this may be different). If you download materials from an unlawful source (i.e. a source where the work has been made available for download without authorisation), you are infringing copyright. I am not able to locate relevant case law, but I do not think that "good faith" (i.e. you did not know about the unlawfulness of the source) matters.
In other words: Downloading protected works without permission is illegal and you can be punished if you do this (I doubt that they'll throw you in jail, but I fine is not unlikely if you are caught.)
add a comment |
That website is infringing on my copyright for the work "When They Kill A President" by Roger Craig. I notified them through their email, and sent them a cease and desist letter over 2 weeks ago, but they have not removed my property yet. My next step is to file a lawsuit against them and others hosting my property without my permission who I've also sent notification to.
Here is my property on Amazon, where I am the only verified rights holder for the work:
http://amazon.com/dp/B07P1NZCBB
Steve Cameron
Thedeputyfilm@gmail.com
http://www.Facebook.com/WhenTheyKillAPresident
New contributor
Steve Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f28677%2fdmca-disclaimers-impact-on-hosted-material%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Duration of copyright depends on the jurisdiction, but in many, including the EU, they last for 70 years after the death of the longest living creator, or for 70 years after creation if no individual creator can be identified.
As for the notice you quote, this is just standard DMCA stuff. Basically, the DMCA provides safe harbor (i.e. immunity to prosecution) for a site owner for copyright infringement until he is noticed about infringement. The notice you quote is a declaration that says that the site owner intends to comply with the DMCA notice and take-down procedure. This notice has no effect on your right or liabilities if you choose to dowload works from the site.
As for being punished for infringing copyright by downloading stuff from the Internet (including the site you link to - but too specific legal advice is off-topic here):
In the EU, downloading a work from the internet constitutes an act of reproduction and needs the authorisation of the rights holders, even if it is for personal and private use (in other jurisdictions this may be different). If you download materials from an unlawful source (i.e. a source where the work has been made available for download without authorisation), you are infringing copyright. I am not able to locate relevant case law, but I do not think that "good faith" (i.e. you did not know about the unlawfulness of the source) matters.
In other words: Downloading protected works without permission is illegal and you can be punished if you do this (I doubt that they'll throw you in jail, but I fine is not unlikely if you are caught.)
add a comment |
Duration of copyright depends on the jurisdiction, but in many, including the EU, they last for 70 years after the death of the longest living creator, or for 70 years after creation if no individual creator can be identified.
As for the notice you quote, this is just standard DMCA stuff. Basically, the DMCA provides safe harbor (i.e. immunity to prosecution) for a site owner for copyright infringement until he is noticed about infringement. The notice you quote is a declaration that says that the site owner intends to comply with the DMCA notice and take-down procedure. This notice has no effect on your right or liabilities if you choose to dowload works from the site.
As for being punished for infringing copyright by downloading stuff from the Internet (including the site you link to - but too specific legal advice is off-topic here):
In the EU, downloading a work from the internet constitutes an act of reproduction and needs the authorisation of the rights holders, even if it is for personal and private use (in other jurisdictions this may be different). If you download materials from an unlawful source (i.e. a source where the work has been made available for download without authorisation), you are infringing copyright. I am not able to locate relevant case law, but I do not think that "good faith" (i.e. you did not know about the unlawfulness of the source) matters.
In other words: Downloading protected works without permission is illegal and you can be punished if you do this (I doubt that they'll throw you in jail, but I fine is not unlikely if you are caught.)
add a comment |
Duration of copyright depends on the jurisdiction, but in many, including the EU, they last for 70 years after the death of the longest living creator, or for 70 years after creation if no individual creator can be identified.
As for the notice you quote, this is just standard DMCA stuff. Basically, the DMCA provides safe harbor (i.e. immunity to prosecution) for a site owner for copyright infringement until he is noticed about infringement. The notice you quote is a declaration that says that the site owner intends to comply with the DMCA notice and take-down procedure. This notice has no effect on your right or liabilities if you choose to dowload works from the site.
As for being punished for infringing copyright by downloading stuff from the Internet (including the site you link to - but too specific legal advice is off-topic here):
In the EU, downloading a work from the internet constitutes an act of reproduction and needs the authorisation of the rights holders, even if it is for personal and private use (in other jurisdictions this may be different). If you download materials from an unlawful source (i.e. a source where the work has been made available for download without authorisation), you are infringing copyright. I am not able to locate relevant case law, but I do not think that "good faith" (i.e. you did not know about the unlawfulness of the source) matters.
In other words: Downloading protected works without permission is illegal and you can be punished if you do this (I doubt that they'll throw you in jail, but I fine is not unlikely if you are caught.)
Duration of copyright depends on the jurisdiction, but in many, including the EU, they last for 70 years after the death of the longest living creator, or for 70 years after creation if no individual creator can be identified.
As for the notice you quote, this is just standard DMCA stuff. Basically, the DMCA provides safe harbor (i.e. immunity to prosecution) for a site owner for copyright infringement until he is noticed about infringement. The notice you quote is a declaration that says that the site owner intends to comply with the DMCA notice and take-down procedure. This notice has no effect on your right or liabilities if you choose to dowload works from the site.
As for being punished for infringing copyright by downloading stuff from the Internet (including the site you link to - but too specific legal advice is off-topic here):
In the EU, downloading a work from the internet constitutes an act of reproduction and needs the authorisation of the rights holders, even if it is for personal and private use (in other jurisdictions this may be different). If you download materials from an unlawful source (i.e. a source where the work has been made available for download without authorisation), you are infringing copyright. I am not able to locate relevant case law, but I do not think that "good faith" (i.e. you did not know about the unlawfulness of the source) matters.
In other words: Downloading protected works without permission is illegal and you can be punished if you do this (I doubt that they'll throw you in jail, but I fine is not unlikely if you are caught.)
edited May 21 '18 at 13:44
answered May 21 '18 at 8:14
Free RadicalFree Radical
2,459723
2,459723
add a comment |
add a comment |
That website is infringing on my copyright for the work "When They Kill A President" by Roger Craig. I notified them through their email, and sent them a cease and desist letter over 2 weeks ago, but they have not removed my property yet. My next step is to file a lawsuit against them and others hosting my property without my permission who I've also sent notification to.
Here is my property on Amazon, where I am the only verified rights holder for the work:
http://amazon.com/dp/B07P1NZCBB
Steve Cameron
Thedeputyfilm@gmail.com
http://www.Facebook.com/WhenTheyKillAPresident
New contributor
Steve Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
That website is infringing on my copyright for the work "When They Kill A President" by Roger Craig. I notified them through their email, and sent them a cease and desist letter over 2 weeks ago, but they have not removed my property yet. My next step is to file a lawsuit against them and others hosting my property without my permission who I've also sent notification to.
Here is my property on Amazon, where I am the only verified rights holder for the work:
http://amazon.com/dp/B07P1NZCBB
Steve Cameron
Thedeputyfilm@gmail.com
http://www.Facebook.com/WhenTheyKillAPresident
New contributor
Steve Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
That website is infringing on my copyright for the work "When They Kill A President" by Roger Craig. I notified them through their email, and sent them a cease and desist letter over 2 weeks ago, but they have not removed my property yet. My next step is to file a lawsuit against them and others hosting my property without my permission who I've also sent notification to.
Here is my property on Amazon, where I am the only verified rights holder for the work:
http://amazon.com/dp/B07P1NZCBB
Steve Cameron
Thedeputyfilm@gmail.com
http://www.Facebook.com/WhenTheyKillAPresident
New contributor
Steve Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
That website is infringing on my copyright for the work "When They Kill A President" by Roger Craig. I notified them through their email, and sent them a cease and desist letter over 2 weeks ago, but they have not removed my property yet. My next step is to file a lawsuit against them and others hosting my property without my permission who I've also sent notification to.
Here is my property on Amazon, where I am the only verified rights holder for the work:
http://amazon.com/dp/B07P1NZCBB
Steve Cameron
Thedeputyfilm@gmail.com
http://www.Facebook.com/WhenTheyKillAPresident
New contributor
Steve Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Steve Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 6 mins ago
Steve CameronSteve Cameron
1
1
New contributor
Steve Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Steve Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Steve Cameron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f28677%2fdmca-disclaimers-impact-on-hosted-material%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Please edit your title to make it clearer what your question is.
– Free Radical
May 21 '18 at 8:05