How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?What power generation method is the best to sustain a hovering city?How realistic is the power generation depicted in The Legend of Korra?How long can a power plant continue to generate electricity without maintenance by people?Wireless power generation in a fleet of spaceshipsHow could a mammalian body provide substantial electrical power through non-harmful, “passive” means?Wall thickness depending on the building materials usedWhat materials can be used to construct a massive aerially placed quantum random computer?Could charged plasma be used as a working fluid to spin a magnetic turbine to generate electricity?Cryosleep antifreeze, what possible materials could be used?By any scientific/pseudo-scientific means could plasma be used to increase the lifespans of living creatures?

Is it possible to map the firing of neurons in the human brain so as to stimulate artificial memories in someone else?

Do creatures with a speed 0ft., fly 30ft. (hover) ever touch the ground?

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

Is this draw by repetition?

Did 'Cinema Songs' exist during Hiranyakshipu's time?

What are the G forces leaving Earth orbit?

How to travel to Japan while expressing milk?

Inclusion symbol

How could sorcerers who are able to produce/manipulate almost all forms of energy communicate over large distances?

Obtaining database information and values in extended properties

Finitely generated matrix groups whose eigenvalues are all algebraic

What exactly is ineptocracy?

What's the meaning of "Sollensaussagen"?

What is this scratchy sound on the acoustic guitar called?

How do conventional missiles fly?

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Implication of namely

Finding the reason behind the value of the integral.

Blending or harmonizing

Why can't we say "I have been having a dog"?

How dangerous is XSS

Notepad++ delete until colon for every line with replace all

Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?

What is the opposite of "eschatology"?



How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?


How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?What power generation method is the best to sustain a hovering city?How realistic is the power generation depicted in The Legend of Korra?How long can a power plant continue to generate electricity without maintenance by people?Wireless power generation in a fleet of spaceshipsHow could a mammalian body provide substantial electrical power through non-harmful, “passive” means?Wall thickness depending on the building materials usedWhat materials can be used to construct a massive aerially placed quantum random computer?Could charged plasma be used as a working fluid to spin a magnetic turbine to generate electricity?Cryosleep antifreeze, what possible materials could be used?By any scientific/pseudo-scientific means could plasma be used to increase the lifespans of living creatures?













4












$begingroup$


Background:



In this scenario assume technology is initially equal to our own, but a method is discovered to render material indestructible. The affected material is treated as requiring infinite or arbitrarily high amounts of energy to break any of its bonds whether they be nuclear or chemical (this does mean a previously radioactive material will no longer be able to decay).

Indestructible material can deform provided this wouldn't require breaking bonds or stretching them beyond what would have been possible for the starting material.



The process to make something indestructible costs hundreds of millions of dollars per cubic meter affected so answers should be limited to scenarios where using such an expensive material makes financial sense. Making an object indestructible involves placing it in a sealed reaction chamber and applying the Mcguffin effect to everything within, so you can't make only part of a contiguous object indestructible.



My Question: So how could these aforementioned indestructible materials be used in conjunction with existing or near future technology to improve power generation?



At the very least though I'd imagine there's great utility for power generation in taking advantage of this Mcguffin's ability to easily contain extreme pressures indefinitely (emitting energy through radiation, heat emitted by the vessel and light if the vessel is transparent).










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What are the properties of the material? For instance, it's thermo-conductive and electro-conductive properties? If it transfers heat well then one could simply dig a deep hole put in a rod of the stuff using the heat from below the earth to boil water and run a steam turbine.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Rob The properties of the material are mostly the same as they were before it was made indestructible. The main difference is just that you can't cause any bonds within the material to break. So if you applied the process to say silver it should retain its conductivity.
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    This question is a successful graduate of the Sandbox.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    8 mins ago















4












$begingroup$


Background:



In this scenario assume technology is initially equal to our own, but a method is discovered to render material indestructible. The affected material is treated as requiring infinite or arbitrarily high amounts of energy to break any of its bonds whether they be nuclear or chemical (this does mean a previously radioactive material will no longer be able to decay).

Indestructible material can deform provided this wouldn't require breaking bonds or stretching them beyond what would have been possible for the starting material.



The process to make something indestructible costs hundreds of millions of dollars per cubic meter affected so answers should be limited to scenarios where using such an expensive material makes financial sense. Making an object indestructible involves placing it in a sealed reaction chamber and applying the Mcguffin effect to everything within, so you can't make only part of a contiguous object indestructible.



My Question: So how could these aforementioned indestructible materials be used in conjunction with existing or near future technology to improve power generation?



At the very least though I'd imagine there's great utility for power generation in taking advantage of this Mcguffin's ability to easily contain extreme pressures indefinitely (emitting energy through radiation, heat emitted by the vessel and light if the vessel is transparent).










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What are the properties of the material? For instance, it's thermo-conductive and electro-conductive properties? If it transfers heat well then one could simply dig a deep hole put in a rod of the stuff using the heat from below the earth to boil water and run a steam turbine.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Rob The properties of the material are mostly the same as they were before it was made indestructible. The main difference is just that you can't cause any bonds within the material to break. So if you applied the process to say silver it should retain its conductivity.
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    This question is a successful graduate of the Sandbox.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    8 mins ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


Background:



In this scenario assume technology is initially equal to our own, but a method is discovered to render material indestructible. The affected material is treated as requiring infinite or arbitrarily high amounts of energy to break any of its bonds whether they be nuclear or chemical (this does mean a previously radioactive material will no longer be able to decay).

Indestructible material can deform provided this wouldn't require breaking bonds or stretching them beyond what would have been possible for the starting material.



The process to make something indestructible costs hundreds of millions of dollars per cubic meter affected so answers should be limited to scenarios where using such an expensive material makes financial sense. Making an object indestructible involves placing it in a sealed reaction chamber and applying the Mcguffin effect to everything within, so you can't make only part of a contiguous object indestructible.



My Question: So how could these aforementioned indestructible materials be used in conjunction with existing or near future technology to improve power generation?



At the very least though I'd imagine there's great utility for power generation in taking advantage of this Mcguffin's ability to easily contain extreme pressures indefinitely (emitting energy through radiation, heat emitted by the vessel and light if the vessel is transparent).










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Background:



In this scenario assume technology is initially equal to our own, but a method is discovered to render material indestructible. The affected material is treated as requiring infinite or arbitrarily high amounts of energy to break any of its bonds whether they be nuclear or chemical (this does mean a previously radioactive material will no longer be able to decay).

Indestructible material can deform provided this wouldn't require breaking bonds or stretching them beyond what would have been possible for the starting material.



The process to make something indestructible costs hundreds of millions of dollars per cubic meter affected so answers should be limited to scenarios where using such an expensive material makes financial sense. Making an object indestructible involves placing it in a sealed reaction chamber and applying the Mcguffin effect to everything within, so you can't make only part of a contiguous object indestructible.



My Question: So how could these aforementioned indestructible materials be used in conjunction with existing or near future technology to improve power generation?



At the very least though I'd imagine there's great utility for power generation in taking advantage of this Mcguffin's ability to easily contain extreme pressures indefinitely (emitting energy through radiation, heat emitted by the vessel and light if the vessel is transparent).







science-based technology physics chemistry power-sources






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









Vakus DrakeVakus Drake

865928




865928











  • $begingroup$
    What are the properties of the material? For instance, it's thermo-conductive and electro-conductive properties? If it transfers heat well then one could simply dig a deep hole put in a rod of the stuff using the heat from below the earth to boil water and run a steam turbine.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Rob The properties of the material are mostly the same as they were before it was made indestructible. The main difference is just that you can't cause any bonds within the material to break. So if you applied the process to say silver it should retain its conductivity.
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    This question is a successful graduate of the Sandbox.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    8 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    What are the properties of the material? For instance, it's thermo-conductive and electro-conductive properties? If it transfers heat well then one could simply dig a deep hole put in a rod of the stuff using the heat from below the earth to boil water and run a steam turbine.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Rob The properties of the material are mostly the same as they were before it was made indestructible. The main difference is just that you can't cause any bonds within the material to break. So if you applied the process to say silver it should retain its conductivity.
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    This question is a successful graduate of the Sandbox.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    8 mins ago















$begingroup$
What are the properties of the material? For instance, it's thermo-conductive and electro-conductive properties? If it transfers heat well then one could simply dig a deep hole put in a rod of the stuff using the heat from below the earth to boil water and run a steam turbine.
$endgroup$
– Rob
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
What are the properties of the material? For instance, it's thermo-conductive and electro-conductive properties? If it transfers heat well then one could simply dig a deep hole put in a rod of the stuff using the heat from below the earth to boil water and run a steam turbine.
$endgroup$
– Rob
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@Rob The properties of the material are mostly the same as they were before it was made indestructible. The main difference is just that you can't cause any bonds within the material to break. So if you applied the process to say silver it should retain its conductivity.
$endgroup$
– Vakus Drake
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@Rob The properties of the material are mostly the same as they were before it was made indestructible. The main difference is just that you can't cause any bonds within the material to break. So if you applied the process to say silver it should retain its conductivity.
$endgroup$
– Vakus Drake
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
This question is a successful graduate of the Sandbox.
$endgroup$
– JBH
8 mins ago




$begingroup$
This question is a successful graduate of the Sandbox.
$endgroup$
– JBH
8 mins ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Easy Peasy. Fusion reactors.



The primary challenge involved with fusion power is maintaining containment, which is a big challenge given the pressures and temperatures involved. I've included a link below, but here's the important bit:



"Not only will the neutrons deposit energy in the blanket material, but their impact will convert atoms in the wall and blanket into radioactive forms. Materials will be needed that can extract heat effectively while surviving the neutron-induced structural weakening for extended periods of time."



http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges/fusion.aspx



The TLDR is that currently a PHYSICAL containment solution is impossible, requiring magnetic solutions that suck up most, if not ALL of the power being generated. Your Macguffin would solve this neatly, allowing a simple machined or cast sphere to be turned into a perfect containment vessel for a fusion powerplant of pretty much any size you need.



EDIT: Now that I'm thinking about it, it'd be a good solution for FISSION reactors as well, since a reactor vessel macguffin'd in the manner you describe wouldn't lose containment in a runaway nuclear reaction. The core could still melt down, but it'd stay in the reactor vessel. Your reactor would be destroyed, but it couldn't irradiate the entire powerplant ala Chernobyl or Fukushima.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your link doesn't work
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @VakusDrake weird... try now?
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah it works now, you just left the /fusion.aspx off the link at first
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that meltdowns in an indestructable crucible might be considered a feature not a failure... if you don't have to worry about your fuel elements remaining solid, you can run them at a much higher temperature, which is great for a thermal powerplant.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    45 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime If you have an idea for using these materials to construct a super high energy reactor you should make that into an answer, especially if you know enough about nuclear physics to give a more in depth description of how it would work.
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    40 mins ago


















3












$begingroup$


How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?





Energy storage.



If you can spin a flywheel to relativistic speeds on indestructable bearings using electromagnets (in vacuo), then you can use that flywheel as a lossless energy storage device.



enter image description here



Wikipedia 2019 - CCSA License



The energy density would be infinite (or limited by the unspecified arbitrary high amounts of energy in the question) - thus you would need a microscopic miniscule ammount, a nano-flywheel mounted on gimbals - radically reducing the price per flywheel and opening it up to mass marketing, totally outclassing all battery tech available today.



Not only the obvious solution to the supply and demand issues with windpower, but for vehicles - cars/planes, phones, power-tools, toys, mobile phones and of course space exploration.



Infinite energy storage in the size of a grain of sand.



Miniature Tactical Nuke:



Of course, this section is about political power generation.



To release all that energy in one instant - perhaps an object charged with just below the threshold of it's (unspecified arbitrary potential energy) capacity, could be placed near an enemy stronghold and fed that last few jouls of energy to tip it over the edge, that's the dark side, someone will find a way to weaponise it for sure, if not the leader of some isolationist sanctioned state, then a disaffected teenager.



Power of a civilisation through time travel.



Speculativley: Also it would have potential to enable time travel or at least the potential to send messages back in time as it would exhibit frame dragging. For a few hints on how this could be of tactical use see this answer to another question.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I think the "Hundreds of millions of dollars per cubic meter" criteria excludes your disaffected teenagers. =P
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't really understand how you propose to use this to violate causality since the indestructible material isn't made perfectly rigid (so you can't push/pull on one end of an indestructible rod and have the other end move instantly). Also being indestructible isn't going to make the pivots perfectly frictionless, so you're still going to be losing some energy to heat in your flywheels.
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    50 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @VakusDrake Quite right, I've no Idea how causality violation would work, I'll edit to clear-up the bearings thing too.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    46 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I forsee a couple of issues... 1. charging up a micro flywheel to silly levels is going to require silly hardware (eg. enormous lasers or particle beams) which tend to be silly inefficient. Useful for specialist purposes, not for general purpose. 2. Indestructable does not imply frictionless. 3. extracting large amounts of energy at a useful rate from a miniature flywheel is going to be technically awkward...
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    38 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime We can make X-ray tubes (ie EM in the 1/10 th of a nanometre range), creating a standing wave of a phase a little ahead or a little behind the induced hysteretic field can add or subtract energy from the flywheel: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_hysteresis They're frictionless because they're suspended in a magnetic field in a vacuum as stated.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    28 mins ago



















3












$begingroup$

Nuclear pressure containment is a good method.



Nukes have to be held together to make fission continue for as long as possible. If you hold 20 critical masses together for a full second, you'd generate the largest nuclear explosion ever made by humans.



With indestructible materials, you could hold them together for an hour. At those high energies, there are all sorts of effects that release even more energy.



Make a box out of indestructinum. Put a nuclear bomb in it. Detonate and let it build up fusion-capable pressure. Slowly vent it out to generate power. If your material conducts heat, put it in a very effective cooling system and generate power reactor-style.



Alternatively, vent it out quickly in the direction of someone rich until they give you what you want.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Superb answer, wish I'd thought of it. +1
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    22 mins ago


















0












$begingroup$

"So how could these aforementioned indestructible materials be used in conjunction with existing or near future technology to improve power generation?"



Well, if you could make copper indestructible then you could use it as I mentioned in my comment. Simply dig a very deep hole and place a copper rod in it. The heat at the bottom of the hole would conduct through the rod to boil water at ground level. The boiling water would be used in a convention steam turbine and BAM nearly infinite free and clean energy. The only reason we don't already do this is because copper would melt at the temperatures needed to get enough heat conducting through the rod to boil water on the other end. That and it would be very hard to dig a hole that deep because all the drill bits would melt but since we can make indestructible drill bits, it should be no problem... heck, we could reach the core with indestructible material.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I think you need to work on the logistics of that idea a bit more (though I can see some variation of it working): The copper rod would conduct heat to the surrounding stone so little heat would make it all the way to the surface, and magma can only conduct heat into/through the copper rod so quickly placing limits on power generation (especially given indestructible material is pretty expensive).
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    47 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Vakus Drake Sure, agreed but people are already trying to do this with graphene because of its unique ability to conduct heat. You could surround the copper with a less thermal conductive material to reduce heat transfer to the surrounding rock. Copper conducts heat very well and very fast. See for yourself, grab a piece, hold one end in your fingers and put a lighter to the other end. You can boil water with a blow torch and a copper rod.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    39 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    @VakusDrake In reality I wouldn't worry too much about logistics or details because an indestructible material would take an infinite amount of energy just to exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    35 mins ago


















0












$begingroup$

For a more nerdy approach, you could build indestructible turbines.



(Disclaimer: My memories of thermodynamics are fading in the mists of time, so feel free to blast me in the comments if I'm wrong).



I remember that in thermal power generation (where water is heathed into steam, whose energy is used to move a turbine), they were forced to limit the calor of the steam in output from the turbine, thus reducing the efficiency (basically, the colder the exiting steam, the better the efficiency).

The reason was that if the water steam was allowed to cool too much, it would condensate and create water droplets that would move so fast to act as bullets, damaging the turbine.

But an indestructible turbine could easily withstand this scenario, thus allowing for exploiting all the energy of the steam and generating more power.

Of course it is necessary to evaluate if the increase in efficiency is enough to compensate for the higher cost of the indestructible turbine.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143057%2fhow-could-indestructible-materials-be-used-in-power-generation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7












    $begingroup$

    Easy Peasy. Fusion reactors.



    The primary challenge involved with fusion power is maintaining containment, which is a big challenge given the pressures and temperatures involved. I've included a link below, but here's the important bit:



    "Not only will the neutrons deposit energy in the blanket material, but their impact will convert atoms in the wall and blanket into radioactive forms. Materials will be needed that can extract heat effectively while surviving the neutron-induced structural weakening for extended periods of time."



    http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges/fusion.aspx



    The TLDR is that currently a PHYSICAL containment solution is impossible, requiring magnetic solutions that suck up most, if not ALL of the power being generated. Your Macguffin would solve this neatly, allowing a simple machined or cast sphere to be turned into a perfect containment vessel for a fusion powerplant of pretty much any size you need.



    EDIT: Now that I'm thinking about it, it'd be a good solution for FISSION reactors as well, since a reactor vessel macguffin'd in the manner you describe wouldn't lose containment in a runaway nuclear reaction. The core could still melt down, but it'd stay in the reactor vessel. Your reactor would be destroyed, but it couldn't irradiate the entire powerplant ala Chernobyl or Fukushima.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Your link doesn't work
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @VakusDrake weird... try now?
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Yeah it works now, you just left the /fusion.aspx off the link at first
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      2 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Note that meltdowns in an indestructable crucible might be considered a feature not a failure... if you don't have to worry about your fuel elements remaining solid, you can run them at a much higher temperature, which is great for a thermal powerplant.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      45 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @StarfishPrime If you have an idea for using these materials to construct a super high energy reactor you should make that into an answer, especially if you know enough about nuclear physics to give a more in depth description of how it would work.
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      40 mins ago















    7












    $begingroup$

    Easy Peasy. Fusion reactors.



    The primary challenge involved with fusion power is maintaining containment, which is a big challenge given the pressures and temperatures involved. I've included a link below, but here's the important bit:



    "Not only will the neutrons deposit energy in the blanket material, but their impact will convert atoms in the wall and blanket into radioactive forms. Materials will be needed that can extract heat effectively while surviving the neutron-induced structural weakening for extended periods of time."



    http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges/fusion.aspx



    The TLDR is that currently a PHYSICAL containment solution is impossible, requiring magnetic solutions that suck up most, if not ALL of the power being generated. Your Macguffin would solve this neatly, allowing a simple machined or cast sphere to be turned into a perfect containment vessel for a fusion powerplant of pretty much any size you need.



    EDIT: Now that I'm thinking about it, it'd be a good solution for FISSION reactors as well, since a reactor vessel macguffin'd in the manner you describe wouldn't lose containment in a runaway nuclear reaction. The core could still melt down, but it'd stay in the reactor vessel. Your reactor would be destroyed, but it couldn't irradiate the entire powerplant ala Chernobyl or Fukushima.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Your link doesn't work
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @VakusDrake weird... try now?
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Yeah it works now, you just left the /fusion.aspx off the link at first
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      2 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Note that meltdowns in an indestructable crucible might be considered a feature not a failure... if you don't have to worry about your fuel elements remaining solid, you can run them at a much higher temperature, which is great for a thermal powerplant.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      45 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @StarfishPrime If you have an idea for using these materials to construct a super high energy reactor you should make that into an answer, especially if you know enough about nuclear physics to give a more in depth description of how it would work.
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      40 mins ago













    7












    7








    7





    $begingroup$

    Easy Peasy. Fusion reactors.



    The primary challenge involved with fusion power is maintaining containment, which is a big challenge given the pressures and temperatures involved. I've included a link below, but here's the important bit:



    "Not only will the neutrons deposit energy in the blanket material, but their impact will convert atoms in the wall and blanket into radioactive forms. Materials will be needed that can extract heat effectively while surviving the neutron-induced structural weakening for extended periods of time."



    http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges/fusion.aspx



    The TLDR is that currently a PHYSICAL containment solution is impossible, requiring magnetic solutions that suck up most, if not ALL of the power being generated. Your Macguffin would solve this neatly, allowing a simple machined or cast sphere to be turned into a perfect containment vessel for a fusion powerplant of pretty much any size you need.



    EDIT: Now that I'm thinking about it, it'd be a good solution for FISSION reactors as well, since a reactor vessel macguffin'd in the manner you describe wouldn't lose containment in a runaway nuclear reaction. The core could still melt down, but it'd stay in the reactor vessel. Your reactor would be destroyed, but it couldn't irradiate the entire powerplant ala Chernobyl or Fukushima.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Easy Peasy. Fusion reactors.



    The primary challenge involved with fusion power is maintaining containment, which is a big challenge given the pressures and temperatures involved. I've included a link below, but here's the important bit:



    "Not only will the neutrons deposit energy in the blanket material, but their impact will convert atoms in the wall and blanket into radioactive forms. Materials will be needed that can extract heat effectively while surviving the neutron-induced structural weakening for extended periods of time."



    http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges/fusion.aspx



    The TLDR is that currently a PHYSICAL containment solution is impossible, requiring magnetic solutions that suck up most, if not ALL of the power being generated. Your Macguffin would solve this neatly, allowing a simple machined or cast sphere to be turned into a perfect containment vessel for a fusion powerplant of pretty much any size you need.



    EDIT: Now that I'm thinking about it, it'd be a good solution for FISSION reactors as well, since a reactor vessel macguffin'd in the manner you describe wouldn't lose containment in a runaway nuclear reaction. The core could still melt down, but it'd stay in the reactor vessel. Your reactor would be destroyed, but it couldn't irradiate the entire powerplant ala Chernobyl or Fukushima.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 hours ago

























    answered 2 hours ago









    Morris The CatMorris The Cat

    3,294521




    3,294521











    • $begingroup$
      Your link doesn't work
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @VakusDrake weird... try now?
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Yeah it works now, you just left the /fusion.aspx off the link at first
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      2 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Note that meltdowns in an indestructable crucible might be considered a feature not a failure... if you don't have to worry about your fuel elements remaining solid, you can run them at a much higher temperature, which is great for a thermal powerplant.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      45 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @StarfishPrime If you have an idea for using these materials to construct a super high energy reactor you should make that into an answer, especially if you know enough about nuclear physics to give a more in depth description of how it would work.
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      40 mins ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Your link doesn't work
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @VakusDrake weird... try now?
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Yeah it works now, you just left the /fusion.aspx off the link at first
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      2 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Note that meltdowns in an indestructable crucible might be considered a feature not a failure... if you don't have to worry about your fuel elements remaining solid, you can run them at a much higher temperature, which is great for a thermal powerplant.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      45 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @StarfishPrime If you have an idea for using these materials to construct a super high energy reactor you should make that into an answer, especially if you know enough about nuclear physics to give a more in depth description of how it would work.
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      40 mins ago















    $begingroup$
    Your link doesn't work
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Your link doesn't work
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    2 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @VakusDrake weird... try now?
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @VakusDrake weird... try now?
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    2 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    Yeah it works now, you just left the /fusion.aspx off the link at first
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    2 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    Yeah it works now, you just left the /fusion.aspx off the link at first
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    2 hours ago





    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Note that meltdowns in an indestructable crucible might be considered a feature not a failure... if you don't have to worry about your fuel elements remaining solid, you can run them at a much higher temperature, which is great for a thermal powerplant.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    45 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    Note that meltdowns in an indestructable crucible might be considered a feature not a failure... if you don't have to worry about your fuel elements remaining solid, you can run them at a much higher temperature, which is great for a thermal powerplant.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    45 mins ago












    $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime If you have an idea for using these materials to construct a super high energy reactor you should make that into an answer, especially if you know enough about nuclear physics to give a more in depth description of how it would work.
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    40 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime If you have an idea for using these materials to construct a super high energy reactor you should make that into an answer, especially if you know enough about nuclear physics to give a more in depth description of how it would work.
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    40 mins ago











    3












    $begingroup$


    How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?





    Energy storage.



    If you can spin a flywheel to relativistic speeds on indestructable bearings using electromagnets (in vacuo), then you can use that flywheel as a lossless energy storage device.



    enter image description here



    Wikipedia 2019 - CCSA License



    The energy density would be infinite (or limited by the unspecified arbitrary high amounts of energy in the question) - thus you would need a microscopic miniscule ammount, a nano-flywheel mounted on gimbals - radically reducing the price per flywheel and opening it up to mass marketing, totally outclassing all battery tech available today.



    Not only the obvious solution to the supply and demand issues with windpower, but for vehicles - cars/planes, phones, power-tools, toys, mobile phones and of course space exploration.



    Infinite energy storage in the size of a grain of sand.



    Miniature Tactical Nuke:



    Of course, this section is about political power generation.



    To release all that energy in one instant - perhaps an object charged with just below the threshold of it's (unspecified arbitrary potential energy) capacity, could be placed near an enemy stronghold and fed that last few jouls of energy to tip it over the edge, that's the dark side, someone will find a way to weaponise it for sure, if not the leader of some isolationist sanctioned state, then a disaffected teenager.



    Power of a civilisation through time travel.



    Speculativley: Also it would have potential to enable time travel or at least the potential to send messages back in time as it would exhibit frame dragging. For a few hints on how this could be of tactical use see this answer to another question.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I think the "Hundreds of millions of dollars per cubic meter" criteria excludes your disaffected teenagers. =P
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I don't really understand how you propose to use this to violate causality since the indestructible material isn't made perfectly rigid (so you can't push/pull on one end of an indestructible rod and have the other end move instantly). Also being indestructible isn't going to make the pivots perfectly frictionless, so you're still going to be losing some energy to heat in your flywheels.
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      50 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @VakusDrake Quite right, I've no Idea how causality violation would work, I'll edit to clear-up the bearings thing too.
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      46 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      I forsee a couple of issues... 1. charging up a micro flywheel to silly levels is going to require silly hardware (eg. enormous lasers or particle beams) which tend to be silly inefficient. Useful for specialist purposes, not for general purpose. 2. Indestructable does not imply frictionless. 3. extracting large amounts of energy at a useful rate from a miniature flywheel is going to be technically awkward...
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      38 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @StarfishPrime We can make X-ray tubes (ie EM in the 1/10 th of a nanometre range), creating a standing wave of a phase a little ahead or a little behind the induced hysteretic field can add or subtract energy from the flywheel: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_hysteresis They're frictionless because they're suspended in a magnetic field in a vacuum as stated.
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      28 mins ago
















    3












    $begingroup$


    How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?





    Energy storage.



    If you can spin a flywheel to relativistic speeds on indestructable bearings using electromagnets (in vacuo), then you can use that flywheel as a lossless energy storage device.



    enter image description here



    Wikipedia 2019 - CCSA License



    The energy density would be infinite (or limited by the unspecified arbitrary high amounts of energy in the question) - thus you would need a microscopic miniscule ammount, a nano-flywheel mounted on gimbals - radically reducing the price per flywheel and opening it up to mass marketing, totally outclassing all battery tech available today.



    Not only the obvious solution to the supply and demand issues with windpower, but for vehicles - cars/planes, phones, power-tools, toys, mobile phones and of course space exploration.



    Infinite energy storage in the size of a grain of sand.



    Miniature Tactical Nuke:



    Of course, this section is about political power generation.



    To release all that energy in one instant - perhaps an object charged with just below the threshold of it's (unspecified arbitrary potential energy) capacity, could be placed near an enemy stronghold and fed that last few jouls of energy to tip it over the edge, that's the dark side, someone will find a way to weaponise it for sure, if not the leader of some isolationist sanctioned state, then a disaffected teenager.



    Power of a civilisation through time travel.



    Speculativley: Also it would have potential to enable time travel or at least the potential to send messages back in time as it would exhibit frame dragging. For a few hints on how this could be of tactical use see this answer to another question.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I think the "Hundreds of millions of dollars per cubic meter" criteria excludes your disaffected teenagers. =P
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I don't really understand how you propose to use this to violate causality since the indestructible material isn't made perfectly rigid (so you can't push/pull on one end of an indestructible rod and have the other end move instantly). Also being indestructible isn't going to make the pivots perfectly frictionless, so you're still going to be losing some energy to heat in your flywheels.
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      50 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @VakusDrake Quite right, I've no Idea how causality violation would work, I'll edit to clear-up the bearings thing too.
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      46 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      I forsee a couple of issues... 1. charging up a micro flywheel to silly levels is going to require silly hardware (eg. enormous lasers or particle beams) which tend to be silly inefficient. Useful for specialist purposes, not for general purpose. 2. Indestructable does not imply frictionless. 3. extracting large amounts of energy at a useful rate from a miniature flywheel is going to be technically awkward...
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      38 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @StarfishPrime We can make X-ray tubes (ie EM in the 1/10 th of a nanometre range), creating a standing wave of a phase a little ahead or a little behind the induced hysteretic field can add or subtract energy from the flywheel: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_hysteresis They're frictionless because they're suspended in a magnetic field in a vacuum as stated.
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      28 mins ago














    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$


    How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?





    Energy storage.



    If you can spin a flywheel to relativistic speeds on indestructable bearings using electromagnets (in vacuo), then you can use that flywheel as a lossless energy storage device.



    enter image description here



    Wikipedia 2019 - CCSA License



    The energy density would be infinite (or limited by the unspecified arbitrary high amounts of energy in the question) - thus you would need a microscopic miniscule ammount, a nano-flywheel mounted on gimbals - radically reducing the price per flywheel and opening it up to mass marketing, totally outclassing all battery tech available today.



    Not only the obvious solution to the supply and demand issues with windpower, but for vehicles - cars/planes, phones, power-tools, toys, mobile phones and of course space exploration.



    Infinite energy storage in the size of a grain of sand.



    Miniature Tactical Nuke:



    Of course, this section is about political power generation.



    To release all that energy in one instant - perhaps an object charged with just below the threshold of it's (unspecified arbitrary potential energy) capacity, could be placed near an enemy stronghold and fed that last few jouls of energy to tip it over the edge, that's the dark side, someone will find a way to weaponise it for sure, if not the leader of some isolationist sanctioned state, then a disaffected teenager.



    Power of a civilisation through time travel.



    Speculativley: Also it would have potential to enable time travel or at least the potential to send messages back in time as it would exhibit frame dragging. For a few hints on how this could be of tactical use see this answer to another question.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




    How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?





    Energy storage.



    If you can spin a flywheel to relativistic speeds on indestructable bearings using electromagnets (in vacuo), then you can use that flywheel as a lossless energy storage device.



    enter image description here



    Wikipedia 2019 - CCSA License



    The energy density would be infinite (or limited by the unspecified arbitrary high amounts of energy in the question) - thus you would need a microscopic miniscule ammount, a nano-flywheel mounted on gimbals - radically reducing the price per flywheel and opening it up to mass marketing, totally outclassing all battery tech available today.



    Not only the obvious solution to the supply and demand issues with windpower, but for vehicles - cars/planes, phones, power-tools, toys, mobile phones and of course space exploration.



    Infinite energy storage in the size of a grain of sand.



    Miniature Tactical Nuke:



    Of course, this section is about political power generation.



    To release all that energy in one instant - perhaps an object charged with just below the threshold of it's (unspecified arbitrary potential energy) capacity, could be placed near an enemy stronghold and fed that last few jouls of energy to tip it over the edge, that's the dark side, someone will find a way to weaponise it for sure, if not the leader of some isolationist sanctioned state, then a disaffected teenager.



    Power of a civilisation through time travel.



    Speculativley: Also it would have potential to enable time travel or at least the potential to send messages back in time as it would exhibit frame dragging. For a few hints on how this could be of tactical use see this answer to another question.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 40 mins ago

























    answered 1 hour ago









    AgrajagAgrajag

    6,47411347




    6,47411347











    • $begingroup$
      I think the "Hundreds of millions of dollars per cubic meter" criteria excludes your disaffected teenagers. =P
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I don't really understand how you propose to use this to violate causality since the indestructible material isn't made perfectly rigid (so you can't push/pull on one end of an indestructible rod and have the other end move instantly). Also being indestructible isn't going to make the pivots perfectly frictionless, so you're still going to be losing some energy to heat in your flywheels.
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      50 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @VakusDrake Quite right, I've no Idea how causality violation would work, I'll edit to clear-up the bearings thing too.
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      46 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      I forsee a couple of issues... 1. charging up a micro flywheel to silly levels is going to require silly hardware (eg. enormous lasers or particle beams) which tend to be silly inefficient. Useful for specialist purposes, not for general purpose. 2. Indestructable does not imply frictionless. 3. extracting large amounts of energy at a useful rate from a miniature flywheel is going to be technically awkward...
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      38 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @StarfishPrime We can make X-ray tubes (ie EM in the 1/10 th of a nanometre range), creating a standing wave of a phase a little ahead or a little behind the induced hysteretic field can add or subtract energy from the flywheel: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_hysteresis They're frictionless because they're suspended in a magnetic field in a vacuum as stated.
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      28 mins ago

















    • $begingroup$
      I think the "Hundreds of millions of dollars per cubic meter" criteria excludes your disaffected teenagers. =P
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I don't really understand how you propose to use this to violate causality since the indestructible material isn't made perfectly rigid (so you can't push/pull on one end of an indestructible rod and have the other end move instantly). Also being indestructible isn't going to make the pivots perfectly frictionless, so you're still going to be losing some energy to heat in your flywheels.
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      50 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @VakusDrake Quite right, I've no Idea how causality violation would work, I'll edit to clear-up the bearings thing too.
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      46 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      I forsee a couple of issues... 1. charging up a micro flywheel to silly levels is going to require silly hardware (eg. enormous lasers or particle beams) which tend to be silly inefficient. Useful for specialist purposes, not for general purpose. 2. Indestructable does not imply frictionless. 3. extracting large amounts of energy at a useful rate from a miniature flywheel is going to be technically awkward...
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      38 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @StarfishPrime We can make X-ray tubes (ie EM in the 1/10 th of a nanometre range), creating a standing wave of a phase a little ahead or a little behind the induced hysteretic field can add or subtract energy from the flywheel: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_hysteresis They're frictionless because they're suspended in a magnetic field in a vacuum as stated.
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      28 mins ago
















    $begingroup$
    I think the "Hundreds of millions of dollars per cubic meter" criteria excludes your disaffected teenagers. =P
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    I think the "Hundreds of millions of dollars per cubic meter" criteria excludes your disaffected teenagers. =P
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    1 hour ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I don't really understand how you propose to use this to violate causality since the indestructible material isn't made perfectly rigid (so you can't push/pull on one end of an indestructible rod and have the other end move instantly). Also being indestructible isn't going to make the pivots perfectly frictionless, so you're still going to be losing some energy to heat in your flywheels.
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    50 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    I don't really understand how you propose to use this to violate causality since the indestructible material isn't made perfectly rigid (so you can't push/pull on one end of an indestructible rod and have the other end move instantly). Also being indestructible isn't going to make the pivots perfectly frictionless, so you're still going to be losing some energy to heat in your flywheels.
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    50 mins ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @VakusDrake Quite right, I've no Idea how causality violation would work, I'll edit to clear-up the bearings thing too.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    46 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    @VakusDrake Quite right, I've no Idea how causality violation would work, I'll edit to clear-up the bearings thing too.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    46 mins ago












    $begingroup$
    I forsee a couple of issues... 1. charging up a micro flywheel to silly levels is going to require silly hardware (eg. enormous lasers or particle beams) which tend to be silly inefficient. Useful for specialist purposes, not for general purpose. 2. Indestructable does not imply frictionless. 3. extracting large amounts of energy at a useful rate from a miniature flywheel is going to be technically awkward...
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    38 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    I forsee a couple of issues... 1. charging up a micro flywheel to silly levels is going to require silly hardware (eg. enormous lasers or particle beams) which tend to be silly inefficient. Useful for specialist purposes, not for general purpose. 2. Indestructable does not imply frictionless. 3. extracting large amounts of energy at a useful rate from a miniature flywheel is going to be technically awkward...
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    38 mins ago












    $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime We can make X-ray tubes (ie EM in the 1/10 th of a nanometre range), creating a standing wave of a phase a little ahead or a little behind the induced hysteretic field can add or subtract energy from the flywheel: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_hysteresis They're frictionless because they're suspended in a magnetic field in a vacuum as stated.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    28 mins ago





    $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime We can make X-ray tubes (ie EM in the 1/10 th of a nanometre range), creating a standing wave of a phase a little ahead or a little behind the induced hysteretic field can add or subtract energy from the flywheel: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_hysteresis They're frictionless because they're suspended in a magnetic field in a vacuum as stated.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    28 mins ago












    3












    $begingroup$

    Nuclear pressure containment is a good method.



    Nukes have to be held together to make fission continue for as long as possible. If you hold 20 critical masses together for a full second, you'd generate the largest nuclear explosion ever made by humans.



    With indestructible materials, you could hold them together for an hour. At those high energies, there are all sorts of effects that release even more energy.



    Make a box out of indestructinum. Put a nuclear bomb in it. Detonate and let it build up fusion-capable pressure. Slowly vent it out to generate power. If your material conducts heat, put it in a very effective cooling system and generate power reactor-style.



    Alternatively, vent it out quickly in the direction of someone rich until they give you what you want.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Superb answer, wish I'd thought of it. +1
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      22 mins ago















    3












    $begingroup$

    Nuclear pressure containment is a good method.



    Nukes have to be held together to make fission continue for as long as possible. If you hold 20 critical masses together for a full second, you'd generate the largest nuclear explosion ever made by humans.



    With indestructible materials, you could hold them together for an hour. At those high energies, there are all sorts of effects that release even more energy.



    Make a box out of indestructinum. Put a nuclear bomb in it. Detonate and let it build up fusion-capable pressure. Slowly vent it out to generate power. If your material conducts heat, put it in a very effective cooling system and generate power reactor-style.



    Alternatively, vent it out quickly in the direction of someone rich until they give you what you want.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Superb answer, wish I'd thought of it. +1
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      22 mins ago













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Nuclear pressure containment is a good method.



    Nukes have to be held together to make fission continue for as long as possible. If you hold 20 critical masses together for a full second, you'd generate the largest nuclear explosion ever made by humans.



    With indestructible materials, you could hold them together for an hour. At those high energies, there are all sorts of effects that release even more energy.



    Make a box out of indestructinum. Put a nuclear bomb in it. Detonate and let it build up fusion-capable pressure. Slowly vent it out to generate power. If your material conducts heat, put it in a very effective cooling system and generate power reactor-style.



    Alternatively, vent it out quickly in the direction of someone rich until they give you what you want.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Nuclear pressure containment is a good method.



    Nukes have to be held together to make fission continue for as long as possible. If you hold 20 critical masses together for a full second, you'd generate the largest nuclear explosion ever made by humans.



    With indestructible materials, you could hold them together for an hour. At those high energies, there are all sorts of effects that release even more energy.



    Make a box out of indestructinum. Put a nuclear bomb in it. Detonate and let it build up fusion-capable pressure. Slowly vent it out to generate power. If your material conducts heat, put it in a very effective cooling system and generate power reactor-style.



    Alternatively, vent it out quickly in the direction of someone rich until they give you what you want.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 24 mins ago









    Adrian HallAdrian Hall

    1,297114




    1,297114







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Superb answer, wish I'd thought of it. +1
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      22 mins ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Superb answer, wish I'd thought of it. +1
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      22 mins ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Superb answer, wish I'd thought of it. +1
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    22 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    Superb answer, wish I'd thought of it. +1
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    22 mins ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    "So how could these aforementioned indestructible materials be used in conjunction with existing or near future technology to improve power generation?"



    Well, if you could make copper indestructible then you could use it as I mentioned in my comment. Simply dig a very deep hole and place a copper rod in it. The heat at the bottom of the hole would conduct through the rod to boil water at ground level. The boiling water would be used in a convention steam turbine and BAM nearly infinite free and clean energy. The only reason we don't already do this is because copper would melt at the temperatures needed to get enough heat conducting through the rod to boil water on the other end. That and it would be very hard to dig a hole that deep because all the drill bits would melt but since we can make indestructible drill bits, it should be no problem... heck, we could reach the core with indestructible material.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I think you need to work on the logistics of that idea a bit more (though I can see some variation of it working): The copper rod would conduct heat to the surrounding stone so little heat would make it all the way to the surface, and magma can only conduct heat into/through the copper rod so quickly placing limits on power generation (especially given indestructible material is pretty expensive).
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      47 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Vakus Drake Sure, agreed but people are already trying to do this with graphene because of its unique ability to conduct heat. You could surround the copper with a less thermal conductive material to reduce heat transfer to the surrounding rock. Copper conducts heat very well and very fast. See for yourself, grab a piece, hold one end in your fingers and put a lighter to the other end. You can boil water with a blow torch and a copper rod.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob
      39 mins ago











    • $begingroup$
      @VakusDrake In reality I wouldn't worry too much about logistics or details because an indestructible material would take an infinite amount of energy just to exist.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob
      35 mins ago















    0












    $begingroup$

    "So how could these aforementioned indestructible materials be used in conjunction with existing or near future technology to improve power generation?"



    Well, if you could make copper indestructible then you could use it as I mentioned in my comment. Simply dig a very deep hole and place a copper rod in it. The heat at the bottom of the hole would conduct through the rod to boil water at ground level. The boiling water would be used in a convention steam turbine and BAM nearly infinite free and clean energy. The only reason we don't already do this is because copper would melt at the temperatures needed to get enough heat conducting through the rod to boil water on the other end. That and it would be very hard to dig a hole that deep because all the drill bits would melt but since we can make indestructible drill bits, it should be no problem... heck, we could reach the core with indestructible material.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I think you need to work on the logistics of that idea a bit more (though I can see some variation of it working): The copper rod would conduct heat to the surrounding stone so little heat would make it all the way to the surface, and magma can only conduct heat into/through the copper rod so quickly placing limits on power generation (especially given indestructible material is pretty expensive).
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      47 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Vakus Drake Sure, agreed but people are already trying to do this with graphene because of its unique ability to conduct heat. You could surround the copper with a less thermal conductive material to reduce heat transfer to the surrounding rock. Copper conducts heat very well and very fast. See for yourself, grab a piece, hold one end in your fingers and put a lighter to the other end. You can boil water with a blow torch and a copper rod.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob
      39 mins ago











    • $begingroup$
      @VakusDrake In reality I wouldn't worry too much about logistics or details because an indestructible material would take an infinite amount of energy just to exist.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob
      35 mins ago













    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    "So how could these aforementioned indestructible materials be used in conjunction with existing or near future technology to improve power generation?"



    Well, if you could make copper indestructible then you could use it as I mentioned in my comment. Simply dig a very deep hole and place a copper rod in it. The heat at the bottom of the hole would conduct through the rod to boil water at ground level. The boiling water would be used in a convention steam turbine and BAM nearly infinite free and clean energy. The only reason we don't already do this is because copper would melt at the temperatures needed to get enough heat conducting through the rod to boil water on the other end. That and it would be very hard to dig a hole that deep because all the drill bits would melt but since we can make indestructible drill bits, it should be no problem... heck, we could reach the core with indestructible material.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$



    "So how could these aforementioned indestructible materials be used in conjunction with existing or near future technology to improve power generation?"



    Well, if you could make copper indestructible then you could use it as I mentioned in my comment. Simply dig a very deep hole and place a copper rod in it. The heat at the bottom of the hole would conduct through the rod to boil water at ground level. The boiling water would be used in a convention steam turbine and BAM nearly infinite free and clean energy. The only reason we don't already do this is because copper would melt at the temperatures needed to get enough heat conducting through the rod to boil water on the other end. That and it would be very hard to dig a hole that deep because all the drill bits would melt but since we can make indestructible drill bits, it should be no problem... heck, we could reach the core with indestructible material.







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer






    New contributor




    Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered 50 mins ago









    RobRob

    2114




    2114




    New contributor




    Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.











    • $begingroup$
      I think you need to work on the logistics of that idea a bit more (though I can see some variation of it working): The copper rod would conduct heat to the surrounding stone so little heat would make it all the way to the surface, and magma can only conduct heat into/through the copper rod so quickly placing limits on power generation (especially given indestructible material is pretty expensive).
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      47 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Vakus Drake Sure, agreed but people are already trying to do this with graphene because of its unique ability to conduct heat. You could surround the copper with a less thermal conductive material to reduce heat transfer to the surrounding rock. Copper conducts heat very well and very fast. See for yourself, grab a piece, hold one end in your fingers and put a lighter to the other end. You can boil water with a blow torch and a copper rod.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob
      39 mins ago











    • $begingroup$
      @VakusDrake In reality I wouldn't worry too much about logistics or details because an indestructible material would take an infinite amount of energy just to exist.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob
      35 mins ago
















    • $begingroup$
      I think you need to work on the logistics of that idea a bit more (though I can see some variation of it working): The copper rod would conduct heat to the surrounding stone so little heat would make it all the way to the surface, and magma can only conduct heat into/through the copper rod so quickly placing limits on power generation (especially given indestructible material is pretty expensive).
      $endgroup$
      – Vakus Drake
      47 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Vakus Drake Sure, agreed but people are already trying to do this with graphene because of its unique ability to conduct heat. You could surround the copper with a less thermal conductive material to reduce heat transfer to the surrounding rock. Copper conducts heat very well and very fast. See for yourself, grab a piece, hold one end in your fingers and put a lighter to the other end. You can boil water with a blow torch and a copper rod.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob
      39 mins ago











    • $begingroup$
      @VakusDrake In reality I wouldn't worry too much about logistics or details because an indestructible material would take an infinite amount of energy just to exist.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob
      35 mins ago















    $begingroup$
    I think you need to work on the logistics of that idea a bit more (though I can see some variation of it working): The copper rod would conduct heat to the surrounding stone so little heat would make it all the way to the surface, and magma can only conduct heat into/through the copper rod so quickly placing limits on power generation (especially given indestructible material is pretty expensive).
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    47 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    I think you need to work on the logistics of that idea a bit more (though I can see some variation of it working): The copper rod would conduct heat to the surrounding stone so little heat would make it all the way to the surface, and magma can only conduct heat into/through the copper rod so quickly placing limits on power generation (especially given indestructible material is pretty expensive).
    $endgroup$
    – Vakus Drake
    47 mins ago












    $begingroup$
    @Vakus Drake Sure, agreed but people are already trying to do this with graphene because of its unique ability to conduct heat. You could surround the copper with a less thermal conductive material to reduce heat transfer to the surrounding rock. Copper conducts heat very well and very fast. See for yourself, grab a piece, hold one end in your fingers and put a lighter to the other end. You can boil water with a blow torch and a copper rod.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    39 mins ago





    $begingroup$
    @Vakus Drake Sure, agreed but people are already trying to do this with graphene because of its unique ability to conduct heat. You could surround the copper with a less thermal conductive material to reduce heat transfer to the surrounding rock. Copper conducts heat very well and very fast. See for yourself, grab a piece, hold one end in your fingers and put a lighter to the other end. You can boil water with a blow torch and a copper rod.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    39 mins ago













    $begingroup$
    @VakusDrake In reality I wouldn't worry too much about logistics or details because an indestructible material would take an infinite amount of energy just to exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    35 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    @VakusDrake In reality I wouldn't worry too much about logistics or details because an indestructible material would take an infinite amount of energy just to exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    35 mins ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    For a more nerdy approach, you could build indestructible turbines.



    (Disclaimer: My memories of thermodynamics are fading in the mists of time, so feel free to blast me in the comments if I'm wrong).



    I remember that in thermal power generation (where water is heathed into steam, whose energy is used to move a turbine), they were forced to limit the calor of the steam in output from the turbine, thus reducing the efficiency (basically, the colder the exiting steam, the better the efficiency).

    The reason was that if the water steam was allowed to cool too much, it would condensate and create water droplets that would move so fast to act as bullets, damaging the turbine.

    But an indestructible turbine could easily withstand this scenario, thus allowing for exploiting all the energy of the steam and generating more power.

    Of course it is necessary to evaluate if the increase in efficiency is enough to compensate for the higher cost of the indestructible turbine.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      For a more nerdy approach, you could build indestructible turbines.



      (Disclaimer: My memories of thermodynamics are fading in the mists of time, so feel free to blast me in the comments if I'm wrong).



      I remember that in thermal power generation (where water is heathed into steam, whose energy is used to move a turbine), they were forced to limit the calor of the steam in output from the turbine, thus reducing the efficiency (basically, the colder the exiting steam, the better the efficiency).

      The reason was that if the water steam was allowed to cool too much, it would condensate and create water droplets that would move so fast to act as bullets, damaging the turbine.

      But an indestructible turbine could easily withstand this scenario, thus allowing for exploiting all the energy of the steam and generating more power.

      Of course it is necessary to evaluate if the increase in efficiency is enough to compensate for the higher cost of the indestructible turbine.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        For a more nerdy approach, you could build indestructible turbines.



        (Disclaimer: My memories of thermodynamics are fading in the mists of time, so feel free to blast me in the comments if I'm wrong).



        I remember that in thermal power generation (where water is heathed into steam, whose energy is used to move a turbine), they were forced to limit the calor of the steam in output from the turbine, thus reducing the efficiency (basically, the colder the exiting steam, the better the efficiency).

        The reason was that if the water steam was allowed to cool too much, it would condensate and create water droplets that would move so fast to act as bullets, damaging the turbine.

        But an indestructible turbine could easily withstand this scenario, thus allowing for exploiting all the energy of the steam and generating more power.

        Of course it is necessary to evaluate if the increase in efficiency is enough to compensate for the higher cost of the indestructible turbine.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        For a more nerdy approach, you could build indestructible turbines.



        (Disclaimer: My memories of thermodynamics are fading in the mists of time, so feel free to blast me in the comments if I'm wrong).



        I remember that in thermal power generation (where water is heathed into steam, whose energy is used to move a turbine), they were forced to limit the calor of the steam in output from the turbine, thus reducing the efficiency (basically, the colder the exiting steam, the better the efficiency).

        The reason was that if the water steam was allowed to cool too much, it would condensate and create water droplets that would move so fast to act as bullets, damaging the turbine.

        But an indestructible turbine could easily withstand this scenario, thus allowing for exploiting all the energy of the steam and generating more power.

        Of course it is necessary to evaluate if the increase in efficiency is enough to compensate for the higher cost of the indestructible turbine.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 28 mins ago









        McTroopersMcTroopers

        8656




        8656



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143057%2fhow-could-indestructible-materials-be-used-in-power-generation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Era Viking Índice Início da Era Viquingue | Cotidiano | Sociedade | Língua | Religião | A arte | As primeiras cidades | As viagens dos viquingues | Viquingues do Oeste e Leste | Fim da Era Viquingue | Fontes históricas | Referências Bibliografia | Ligações externas | Menu de navegação«Sverige då!»«Handel I vikingetid»«O que é Nórdico Antigo»Mito, magia e religião na volsunga saga Um olhar sobre a trajetória mítica do herói sigurd«Bonden var den verklige vikingen»«Vikingatiden»«Vikingatiden»«Vinland»«Guerreiras de Óðinn: As Valkyrjor na Mitologia Viking»1519-9053«Esculpindo símbolos e seres: A arte viking em pedras rúnicas»1679-9313Historia - Tema: VikingarnaAventura e Magia no Mundo das Sagas IslandesasEra Vikinge

            What's the metal clinking sound at the end of credits in Avengers: Endgame?What makes Thanos so strong in Avengers: Endgame?Who is the character that appears at the end of Endgame?What happens to Mjolnir (Thor's hammer) at the end of Endgame?The People's Ages in Avengers: EndgameWhat did Nebula do in Avengers: Endgame?Messing with time in the Avengers: Endgame climaxAvengers: Endgame timelineWhat are the time-travel rules in Avengers Endgame?Why use this song in Avengers: Endgame Opening Logo Sequence?Peggy's age in Avengers Endgame

            Are there legal definitions of ethnicities/races? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Legal definitions in the United StatesAre there truly legal limits on US interest rates?Are gender identity and sexual orientation federally protected?Why is there an apparent legal bias against digital services?What limits are there to the powers of individual judges in the United States legal system?Are women only scholarships legal under Irish / EU law?Is the term “race” defined by Public Law enacted by Congress of the United StatesIs there a legal definition of race in the US?Neighbors are spying for landlord on Renters is it legal?Are Protected Classes Bi-directional?