Can a pro se defendant make statements of fact in his opening and closing arguments?Can a judge put me under oath for closing statements?
Multi tool use
Should I take out a loan for a friend to invest on my behalf?
Accountant/ lawyer will not return my call
Built-In Shelves/Bookcases - IKEA vs Built
Why does the negative sign arise in this thermodynamic relation?
PTIJ: Why can't I eat anything?
How could our ancestors have domesticated a solitary predator?
Does splitting a potentially monolithic application into several smaller ones help prevent bugs?
How much attack damage does the AC boost from a shield prevent on average?
Should QA ask requirements to developers?
Should I tell my boss the work he did was worthless
Can Mathematica be used to create an Artistic 3D extrusion from a 2D image and wrap a line pattern around it?
Extra alignment tab has been changed to cr. } using table, tabular and resizebox
Set and print content of environment variable in cmd.exe subshell?
Why does Captain Marvel assume the people on this planet know this?
Fourth person (in Slavey language)
Why is this plane circling around the Lucknow airport every day?
What is the likely impact of grounding an entire aircraft series?
Is there a window switcher for GNOME that shows the actual window?
How to create a hard link to an inode (ext4)?
Space in array system equations
Why doesn't this Google Translate ad use the word "Translation" instead of "Translate"?
Unreachable code, but reachable with exception
In the late 1940’s to early 1950’s what technology was available that could melt a LOT of ice?
If the Captain's screens are out, does he switch seats with the co-pilot?
Can a pro se defendant make statements of fact in his opening and closing arguments?
Can a judge put me under oath for closing statements?
If a defendant in a criminal case testifies on the stand, then they must submit to cross examination, which is not good for them.
However, if a defendant is conducting his case pro se, then can he make statements of fact during opening and closing arguments and thereby avoid cross examination of those facts or statements. Will a judge try to prevent this?
For example, imagine a defendant is charged with vehicular manslaughter for running over a pedestrian. The defendant conducts his own defense and in his closing arguments says, "The man ran in front of my car, there was no way to stop in time" and this fact has not been introduced to the case previously. Will the judge in such a case try to stop the defendant from making such a statement in his closing argument?
criminal-law pro-se
asked Aug 12 '18 at 4:20
CiceroCicero
2,4921125
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 9 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
If a defendant in a criminal case testifies on the stand, then they must submit to cross examination, which is not good for them.
However, if a defendant is conducting his case pro se, then can he make statements of fact during opening and closing arguments and thereby avoid cross examination of those facts or statements. Will a judge try to prevent this?
For example, imagine a defendant is charged with vehicular manslaughter for running over a pedestrian. The defendant conducts his own defense and in his closing arguments says, "The man ran in front of my car, there was no way to stop in time" and this fact has not been introduced to the case previously. Will the judge in such a case try to stop the defendant from making such a statement in his closing argument?
criminal-law pro-se
asked Aug 12 '18 at 4:20
CiceroCicero
2,4921125
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 9 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
If a defendant in a criminal case testifies on the stand, then they must submit to cross examination, which is not good for them.
However, if a defendant is conducting his case pro se, then can he make statements of fact during opening and closing arguments and thereby avoid cross examination of those facts or statements. Will a judge try to prevent this?
For example, imagine a defendant is charged with vehicular manslaughter for running over a pedestrian. The defendant conducts his own defense and in his closing arguments says, "The man ran in front of my car, there was no way to stop in time" and this fact has not been introduced to the case previously. Will the judge in such a case try to stop the defendant from making such a statement in his closing argument?
criminal-law pro-se
asked Aug 12 '18 at 4:20
CiceroCicero
2,4921125
If a defendant in a criminal case testifies on the stand, then they must submit to cross examination, which is not good for them.
However, if a defendant is conducting his case pro se, then can he make statements of fact during opening and closing arguments and thereby avoid cross examination of those facts or statements. Will a judge try to prevent this?
For example, imagine a defendant is charged with vehicular manslaughter for running over a pedestrian. The defendant conducts his own defense and in his closing arguments says, "The man ran in front of my car, there was no way to stop in time" and this fact has not been introduced to the case previously. Will the judge in such a case try to stop the defendant from making such a statement in his closing argument?
criminal-law pro-se
criminal-law pro-se
asked Aug 12 '18 at 4:20
CiceroCicero
2,4921125
asked Aug 12 '18 at 4:20
CiceroCicero
2,4921125
asked Aug 12 '18 at 4:20
CiceroCicero
2,4921125
asked Aug 12 '18 at 4:20
CiceroCicero
2,4921125
asked Aug 12 '18 at 4:20
CiceroCicero
2,4921125
2,4921125
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 9 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 9 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
My understanding is that you can make statements of fact as a pro se defendant, but the judge can choose to ignore those statements; however, the judge cannot use those statements against a pro se defendant as inculpatory evidence or admissions of guilt.
answered Jan 11 at 12:59
Brent FestgeBrent Festge
1
The question is mostly about jury trials. In other words , I want to know if the judge will try to interfere with a pro se defendant making statements of fact to a jury during opening and closing arguments.
– Cicero
Jan 11 at 13:32
I don't know if the judge would actually instruct the jury to ignore statements of fact from opening statements, but a normal jury won't take anything you say in your opening as a proven fact. They will expect you to prove or establish reasonable doubt in cross examination. Also whether the man ran in front of your car or not may not be a defense depending on the text of the law used against you.
– pboss3010
Jan 11 at 15:23
add a comment |
The general rule is that in the opening statement, the lawyer may describe what he expects the evidence and testimony to show:
We will present Mr Smith, who will tell you that he saw the defendant miles away at the time of the crime
But cannot make statements of fact as such. I don't see why this rule would be different for a pro se defendant.
answered Feb 10 at 14:36
David SiegelDavid Siegel
12.7k2348
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30912%2fcan-a-pro-se-defendant-make-statements-of-fact-in-his-opening-and-closing-argume%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
My understanding is that you can make statements of fact as a pro se defendant, but the judge can choose to ignore those statements; however, the judge cannot use those statements against a pro se defendant as inculpatory evidence or admissions of guilt.
answered Jan 11 at 12:59
Brent FestgeBrent Festge
1
The question is mostly about jury trials. In other words , I want to know if the judge will try to interfere with a pro se defendant making statements of fact to a jury during opening and closing arguments.
– Cicero
Jan 11 at 13:32
I don't know if the judge would actually instruct the jury to ignore statements of fact from opening statements, but a normal jury won't take anything you say in your opening as a proven fact. They will expect you to prove or establish reasonable doubt in cross examination. Also whether the man ran in front of your car or not may not be a defense depending on the text of the law used against you.
– pboss3010
Jan 11 at 15:23
add a comment |
My understanding is that you can make statements of fact as a pro se defendant, but the judge can choose to ignore those statements; however, the judge cannot use those statements against a pro se defendant as inculpatory evidence or admissions of guilt.
answered Jan 11 at 12:59
Brent FestgeBrent Festge
1
The question is mostly about jury trials. In other words , I want to know if the judge will try to interfere with a pro se defendant making statements of fact to a jury during opening and closing arguments.
– Cicero
Jan 11 at 13:32
I don't know if the judge would actually instruct the jury to ignore statements of fact from opening statements, but a normal jury won't take anything you say in your opening as a proven fact. They will expect you to prove or establish reasonable doubt in cross examination. Also whether the man ran in front of your car or not may not be a defense depending on the text of the law used against you.
– pboss3010
Jan 11 at 15:23
add a comment |
My understanding is that you can make statements of fact as a pro se defendant, but the judge can choose to ignore those statements; however, the judge cannot use those statements against a pro se defendant as inculpatory evidence or admissions of guilt.
answered Jan 11 at 12:59
Brent FestgeBrent Festge
1
My understanding is that you can make statements of fact as a pro se defendant, but the judge can choose to ignore those statements; however, the judge cannot use those statements against a pro se defendant as inculpatory evidence or admissions of guilt.
answered Jan 11 at 12:59
Brent FestgeBrent Festge
1
answered Jan 11 at 12:59
Brent FestgeBrent Festge
1
answered Jan 11 at 12:59
Brent FestgeBrent Festge
1
answered Jan 11 at 12:59
Brent FestgeBrent Festge
1
1
The question is mostly about jury trials. In other words , I want to know if the judge will try to interfere with a pro se defendant making statements of fact to a jury during opening and closing arguments.
– Cicero
Jan 11 at 13:32
I don't know if the judge would actually instruct the jury to ignore statements of fact from opening statements, but a normal jury won't take anything you say in your opening as a proven fact. They will expect you to prove or establish reasonable doubt in cross examination. Also whether the man ran in front of your car or not may not be a defense depending on the text of the law used against you.
– pboss3010
Jan 11 at 15:23
add a comment |
The question is mostly about jury trials. In other words , I want to know if the judge will try to interfere with a pro se defendant making statements of fact to a jury during opening and closing arguments.
– Cicero
Jan 11 at 13:32
I don't know if the judge would actually instruct the jury to ignore statements of fact from opening statements, but a normal jury won't take anything you say in your opening as a proven fact. They will expect you to prove or establish reasonable doubt in cross examination. Also whether the man ran in front of your car or not may not be a defense depending on the text of the law used against you.
– pboss3010
Jan 11 at 15:23
The question is mostly about jury trials. In other words , I want to know if the judge will try to interfere with a pro se defendant making statements of fact to a jury during opening and closing arguments.
– Cicero
Jan 11 at 13:32
The question is mostly about jury trials. In other words , I want to know if the judge will try to interfere with a pro se defendant making statements of fact to a jury during opening and closing arguments.
– Cicero
Jan 11 at 13:32
I don't know if the judge would actually instruct the jury to ignore statements of fact from opening statements, but a normal jury won't take anything you say in your opening as a proven fact. They will expect you to prove or establish reasonable doubt in cross examination. Also whether the man ran in front of your car or not may not be a defense depending on the text of the law used against you.
– pboss3010
Jan 11 at 15:23
I don't know if the judge would actually instruct the jury to ignore statements of fact from opening statements, but a normal jury won't take anything you say in your opening as a proven fact. They will expect you to prove or establish reasonable doubt in cross examination. Also whether the man ran in front of your car or not may not be a defense depending on the text of the law used against you.
– pboss3010
Jan 11 at 15:23
add a comment |
The general rule is that in the opening statement, the lawyer may describe what he expects the evidence and testimony to show:
We will present Mr Smith, who will tell you that he saw the defendant miles away at the time of the crime
But cannot make statements of fact as such. I don't see why this rule would be different for a pro se defendant.
answered Feb 10 at 14:36
David SiegelDavid Siegel
12.7k2348
add a comment |
The general rule is that in the opening statement, the lawyer may describe what he expects the evidence and testimony to show:
We will present Mr Smith, who will tell you that he saw the defendant miles away at the time of the crime
But cannot make statements of fact as such. I don't see why this rule would be different for a pro se defendant.
answered Feb 10 at 14:36
David SiegelDavid Siegel
12.7k2348
add a comment |
The general rule is that in the opening statement, the lawyer may describe what he expects the evidence and testimony to show:
We will present Mr Smith, who will tell you that he saw the defendant miles away at the time of the crime
But cannot make statements of fact as such. I don't see why this rule would be different for a pro se defendant.
answered Feb 10 at 14:36
David SiegelDavid Siegel
12.7k2348
The general rule is that in the opening statement, the lawyer may describe what he expects the evidence and testimony to show:
We will present Mr Smith, who will tell you that he saw the defendant miles away at the time of the crime
But cannot make statements of fact as such. I don't see why this rule would be different for a pro se defendant.
answered Feb 10 at 14:36
David SiegelDavid Siegel
12.7k2348
answered Feb 10 at 14:36
David SiegelDavid Siegel
12.7k2348
answered Feb 10 at 14:36
David SiegelDavid Siegel
12.7k2348
answered Feb 10 at 14:36
David SiegelDavid Siegel
12.7k2348
12.7k2348
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30912%2fcan-a-pro-se-defendant-make-statements-of-fact-in-his-opening-and-closing-argume%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
96ULJJDRngE2ehotQ,jKUDYD,BCnJp
