Upper bound for the number of solutions of a Diophantine equationConditions that allow unique solutions for Linear Diophantine equationsInfinitely many solutions of a diophantine equationGrowth of sums of multiplicative functions over SquarefreesLogarithmic bound for Diophantine equationQuantum Mechanics derivation of Wallis' Formula?Solvability of Diophantine equation using congruences where the variables are bounded?Is there (conjectural) upper bound for the largest solution of Diophantine equation with finitely many solutions?On the notion of primary representation of a natural number by a quadratic formCase D=4l in Elkies' paper on Supersingular Primes of an Elliptic Curve over $mathbbQ$Best possibe bound for the number of solutions of diophantine approximation?

Upper bound for the number of solutions of a Diophantine equation


Conditions that allow unique solutions for Linear Diophantine equationsInfinitely many solutions of a diophantine equationGrowth of sums of multiplicative functions over SquarefreesLogarithmic bound for Diophantine equationQuantum Mechanics derivation of Wallis' Formula?Solvability of Diophantine equation using congruences where the variables are bounded?Is there (conjectural) upper bound for the largest solution of Diophantine equation with finitely many solutions?On the notion of primary representation of a natural number by a quadratic formCase D=4l in Elkies' paper on Supersingular Primes of an Elliptic Curve over $mathbbQ$Best possibe bound for the number of solutions of diophantine approximation?













1












$begingroup$


Consider the Diophantine equation



$$k^2 + k - sigma (ell^2 + ell) = m,$$
where $N leq k leq 2 N$, $L leq ell leq 2 L$, $m in mathbbZ$ and $sigma in mathbbR$.



My question is the following. For which values of the parameter $sigma$, is possible to say that
the number of solutions of this equation is bounded by $O(min(N, L)^epsilon)$ ?



To facilitate progress, I'm going to put this auxiliar lemma.



$underline Lemma$. For every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists $C_varepsilon > 0$
such that, for every $m in mathbbZ$ and $K$ positive integer,



$$sharp (x, y) in mathbbN^2 mid K leq x leq 2 K , x^2 pm y^2 = m leq C_varepsilon K^varepsilon. $$



I would be very grateful for any suggestion!










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 9




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_epsilon K^epsilon$ for $epsilon<1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp Lampe
    5 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_1/2$ is $C_1/2K^1/2>K+1$ for all $K$?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex B.
    2 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


Consider the Diophantine equation



$$k^2 + k - sigma (ell^2 + ell) = m,$$
where $N leq k leq 2 N$, $L leq ell leq 2 L$, $m in mathbbZ$ and $sigma in mathbbR$.



My question is the following. For which values of the parameter $sigma$, is possible to say that
the number of solutions of this equation is bounded by $O(min(N, L)^epsilon)$ ?



To facilitate progress, I'm going to put this auxiliar lemma.



$underline Lemma$. For every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists $C_varepsilon > 0$
such that, for every $m in mathbbZ$ and $K$ positive integer,



$$sharp (x, y) in mathbbN^2 mid K leq x leq 2 K , x^2 pm y^2 = m leq C_varepsilon K^varepsilon. $$



I would be very grateful for any suggestion!










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 9




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_epsilon K^epsilon$ for $epsilon<1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp Lampe
    5 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_1/2$ is $C_1/2K^1/2>K+1$ for all $K$?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex B.
    2 hours ago













1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


Consider the Diophantine equation



$$k^2 + k - sigma (ell^2 + ell) = m,$$
where $N leq k leq 2 N$, $L leq ell leq 2 L$, $m in mathbbZ$ and $sigma in mathbbR$.



My question is the following. For which values of the parameter $sigma$, is possible to say that
the number of solutions of this equation is bounded by $O(min(N, L)^epsilon)$ ?



To facilitate progress, I'm going to put this auxiliar lemma.



$underline Lemma$. For every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists $C_varepsilon > 0$
such that, for every $m in mathbbZ$ and $K$ positive integer,



$$sharp (x, y) in mathbbN^2 mid K leq x leq 2 K , x^2 pm y^2 = m leq C_varepsilon K^varepsilon. $$



I would be very grateful for any suggestion!










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Consider the Diophantine equation



$$k^2 + k - sigma (ell^2 + ell) = m,$$
where $N leq k leq 2 N$, $L leq ell leq 2 L$, $m in mathbbZ$ and $sigma in mathbbR$.



My question is the following. For which values of the parameter $sigma$, is possible to say that
the number of solutions of this equation is bounded by $O(min(N, L)^epsilon)$ ?



To facilitate progress, I'm going to put this auxiliar lemma.



$underline Lemma$. For every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists $C_varepsilon > 0$
such that, for every $m in mathbbZ$ and $K$ positive integer,



$$sharp (x, y) in mathbbN^2 mid K leq x leq 2 K , x^2 pm y^2 = m leq C_varepsilon K^varepsilon. $$



I would be very grateful for any suggestion!







nt.number-theory






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









Marcelo NogueiraMarcelo Nogueira

132




132




New contributor




Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 9




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_epsilon K^epsilon$ for $epsilon<1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp Lampe
    5 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_1/2$ is $C_1/2K^1/2>K+1$ for all $K$?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex B.
    2 hours ago












  • 9




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_epsilon K^epsilon$ for $epsilon<1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp Lampe
    5 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_1/2$ is $C_1/2K^1/2>K+1$ for all $K$?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex B.
    2 hours ago







9




9




$begingroup$
The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_epsilon K^epsilon$ for $epsilon<1$.
$endgroup$
– Philipp Lampe
5 hours ago





$begingroup$
The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_epsilon K^epsilon$ for $epsilon<1$.
$endgroup$
– Philipp Lampe
5 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
5 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
@MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_1/2$ is $C_1/2K^1/2>K+1$ for all $K$?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_1/2$ is $C_1/2K^1/2>K+1$ for all $K$?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbbQ$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.



Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)



For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.



For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbbZ$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.



The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbbQ^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbbZ^2$) in the original problem.



tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Nell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    1 hour ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325448%2fupper-bound-for-the-number-of-solutions-of-a-diophantine-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbbQ$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.



Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)



For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.



For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbbZ$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.



The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbbQ^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbbZ^2$) in the original problem.



tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Nell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    1 hour ago
















5












$begingroup$

First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbbQ$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.



Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)



For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.



For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbbZ$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.



The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbbQ^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbbZ^2$) in the original problem.



tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Nell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    1 hour ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$

First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbbQ$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.



Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)



For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.



For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbbZ$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.



The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbbQ^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbbZ^2$) in the original problem.



tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Nell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$



First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbbQ$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.



Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)



For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.



For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbbQ(sqrtd)$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbbZ$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.



The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbbQ^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbbZ^2$) in the original problem.



tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields







share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Nell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 41 mins ago





















New contributor




Nell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 3 hours ago









NellNell

514




514




New contributor




Nell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Nell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Nell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    1 hour ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    1 hour ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
1 hour ago











Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Marcelo Nogueira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325448%2fupper-bound-for-the-number-of-solutions-of-a-diophantine-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?

Shenzhen Football Club Índice Elenco atual | Títulos | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegaçãoGooglenotíciaslivrosacadêmicoeditar«"Elenco"»Site oficialexpandindo-oeee

When We Were Young (canção de Adele) Índice Antecedentes e lançamento | Faixas e formatos | Performances e covers | Desempenho nas tabelas musicais | Créditos | Histórico de lançamento | Referências Menu de navegação«Best albums of 2015»«Adele - When We Were Young (Radio Date: 22-01-2016)»«When We Were Young - Single by Adele»«Adele: Inside Her Private Life and Triumphant Return»«adele interview: world exclusive first interview in three years»«Tobias Jesso Jr: since Adele tweeted his song, he's even bigger than his dad»«Adele interviews Tobias Jesso Jr: 'I think that a couple of the ideas we had could be rap songs'»«Adele on Her Return: 'I Was So Frightened That No One Cared'»«Tobias Jesso Jr. on working with Adele: 'I was as nervous as shit'»«How Ariel Rechtshaid Pushed Adele To Her Limit»«Adele Previews 'When We Were Young' on '60 Minutes' Teaser, Tops Trending 140»«Adele Performs New '25' Ballad, "When We Were Young" Live: Watch»«Which '25' Song Should Be Adele's Next Single?»«Adele's 'When We Were Young' Confirmed As Second Single From '25'»«Adele's new single artwork for 'When We Were Young' is perfectly adorable»«Adele at the BBC review: honest, funny and spectacular – Celebrity News News»«'Saturday Night Live': Adele Sings 'Hello' and 'When We Were Young'»«'Adele: Live in New York City' NBC Special – Set List Revealed!»«Adele Closes Out the 2016 Brit Awards With 'When We Were Young'»«What Is The Adele Live Tour Set List? There's No Way She'd Leave Out These 8 Songs»«See Demi Lovato's Soaring Cover of Adele's 'When We Were Young'»«'The Voice': 5 Best Moments From Week 1 Blind Auditions»«Adele – When We Were Young (Media Control Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Entertainment Monitoring Africa)»«Adele – When We Were Young (ARIA Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ö3 Austria Top 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 50)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Canadian Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Tracklisten)»«Adele – When We Were Young (The Official Charts Company)»«Adele – Hello (IFPI Slovenská Republika)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Productores de Música de España)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Billboard Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Adult Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Adult Contemporary Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Dance Club Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Rock Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (IFPI Finlândia)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Syndicat National de l'Éditon Phonographique)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Magyar Hanglemezkiadók Szövetsége)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Irish Recorded Music Association)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Mexico Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (VG-lista)»«Adele – When We Were Young (NZ Top 40 Singles)»«Adele – When We Were Young (MegaCharts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Związek Producentów Audio Video)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Indie Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Sverigetopplistan)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Schweizer Hitparade)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Music Canada – Gold/Platinum – When We Were Young»«NZ Top 40 Singles Chart»«Certified Awards»e