Can the Flaming Sphere spell be rammed into multiple Tiny creatures that are in the same 5-foot square? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Does the prone ranged defensive bonus apply to a creature hit by Flaming Sphere's initial attack?Does a Flaming Sphere gain combat advantage with its initial attack against a prone enemy?Tiny Creatures sharing a squareHow much does Otiluke's Resilient Sphere weigh?Can a Symbol spell affect the same creature more than once?“Flaming Sphere” spell and initiative movementCan Watery Sphere protect against fall damage?Should Leomund's Tiny Hut keep enemies out?What is the reach of a Tiny creature, when it's not listed?Does the Maddening Darkness spell affect creatures in its radius if they have 9th-level magical light illuminating it?

What makes a man succeed?

Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube

Deconstruction is ambiguous

Is multiple magic items in one inherently imbalanced?

macOS: Name for app shortcut screen found by pinching with thumb and three fingers

Converted a Scalar function to a TVF function for parallel execution-Still running in Serial mode

AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network

Would it be easier to apply for a UK visa if there is a host family to sponsor for you in going there?

Why are my pictures showing a dark band on one edge?

What is the difference between a "ranged attack" and a "ranged weapon attack"?

Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?

Semigroups with no morphisms between them

Misunderstanding of Sylow theory

How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour?

How long can equipment go unused before powering up runs the risk of damage?

What are the discoveries that have been possible with the rejection of positivism?

Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign?

The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?

The Nth Gryphon Number

Is the IBM 5153 color display compatible with the Tandy 1000 16 color modes?

preposition before coffee

Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?

Co-worker has annoying ringtone

A letter with no particular backstory



Can the Flaming Sphere spell be rammed into multiple Tiny creatures that are in the same 5-foot square?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Does the prone ranged defensive bonus apply to a creature hit by Flaming Sphere's initial attack?Does a Flaming Sphere gain combat advantage with its initial attack against a prone enemy?Tiny Creatures sharing a squareHow much does Otiluke's Resilient Sphere weigh?Can a Symbol spell affect the same creature more than once?“Flaming Sphere” spell and initiative movementCan Watery Sphere protect against fall damage?Should Leomund's Tiny Hut keep enemies out?What is the reach of a Tiny creature, when it's not listed?Does the Maddening Darkness spell affect creatures in its radius if they have 9th-level magical light illuminating it?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


The text of the Flaming Sphere spell says that "If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage".



Can I ram a Flaming Sphere into multiple tiny creatures, if they occupy the same 5' by 5' square?



I see nothing forbidding the sphere from being simultaneously rammed into more than one creature.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    6












    $begingroup$


    The text of the Flaming Sphere spell says that "If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage".



    Can I ram a Flaming Sphere into multiple tiny creatures, if they occupy the same 5' by 5' square?



    I see nothing forbidding the sphere from being simultaneously rammed into more than one creature.










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      6












      6








      6





      $begingroup$


      The text of the Flaming Sphere spell says that "If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage".



      Can I ram a Flaming Sphere into multiple tiny creatures, if they occupy the same 5' by 5' square?



      I see nothing forbidding the sphere from being simultaneously rammed into more than one creature.










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The text of the Flaming Sphere spell says that "If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage".



      Can I ram a Flaming Sphere into multiple tiny creatures, if they occupy the same 5' by 5' square?



      I see nothing forbidding the sphere from being simultaneously rammed into more than one creature.







      dnd-5e spells creature-size battle-map






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago







      Merudo

















      asked 3 hours ago









      MerudoMerudo

      515116




      515116




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7












          $begingroup$

          No. Choose one creature to ram into.



          The wording of the spell indicates a single creature. Once it rams into a single creature, the sphere stops. As such, it can only hit one creature before stopping.




          As a bonus action, you can move the sphere up to 30 feet. If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage, and the sphere stops moving this turn.




          The others will take damage if they are 5' of the sphere when they end their turn.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 3




            $begingroup$
            I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
            $endgroup$
            – Merudo
            2 hours ago







          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
            $endgroup$
            – GcL
            2 hours ago


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Yes, you can.



          The wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly by the spell.



          I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
            $endgroup$
            – William Mariager
            2 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            @WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
            $endgroup$
            – nitsua60
            1 min ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145493%2fcan-the-flaming-sphere-spell-be-rammed-into-multiple-tiny-creatures-that-are-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7












          $begingroup$

          No. Choose one creature to ram into.



          The wording of the spell indicates a single creature. Once it rams into a single creature, the sphere stops. As such, it can only hit one creature before stopping.




          As a bonus action, you can move the sphere up to 30 feet. If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage, and the sphere stops moving this turn.




          The others will take damage if they are 5' of the sphere when they end their turn.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 3




            $begingroup$
            I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
            $endgroup$
            – Merudo
            2 hours ago







          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
            $endgroup$
            – GcL
            2 hours ago















          7












          $begingroup$

          No. Choose one creature to ram into.



          The wording of the spell indicates a single creature. Once it rams into a single creature, the sphere stops. As such, it can only hit one creature before stopping.




          As a bonus action, you can move the sphere up to 30 feet. If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage, and the sphere stops moving this turn.




          The others will take damage if they are 5' of the sphere when they end their turn.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 3




            $begingroup$
            I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
            $endgroup$
            – Merudo
            2 hours ago







          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
            $endgroup$
            – GcL
            2 hours ago













          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          No. Choose one creature to ram into.



          The wording of the spell indicates a single creature. Once it rams into a single creature, the sphere stops. As such, it can only hit one creature before stopping.




          As a bonus action, you can move the sphere up to 30 feet. If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage, and the sphere stops moving this turn.




          The others will take damage if they are 5' of the sphere when they end their turn.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          No. Choose one creature to ram into.



          The wording of the spell indicates a single creature. Once it rams into a single creature, the sphere stops. As such, it can only hit one creature before stopping.




          As a bonus action, you can move the sphere up to 30 feet. If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage, and the sphere stops moving this turn.




          The others will take damage if they are 5' of the sphere when they end their turn.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 hours ago

























          answered 3 hours ago









          GcLGcL

          13.1k13886




          13.1k13886







          • 3




            $begingroup$
            I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
            $endgroup$
            – Merudo
            2 hours ago







          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
            $endgroup$
            – GcL
            2 hours ago












          • 3




            $begingroup$
            I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
            $endgroup$
            – Merudo
            2 hours ago







          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
            $endgroup$
            – GcL
            2 hours ago







          3




          3




          $begingroup$
          I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
          $endgroup$
          – Merudo
          2 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
          $endgroup$
          – Merudo
          2 hours ago





          3




          3




          $begingroup$
          @Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
          $endgroup$
          – GcL
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
          $endgroup$
          – GcL
          2 hours ago













          1












          $begingroup$

          Yes, you can.



          The wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly by the spell.



          I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
            $endgroup$
            – William Mariager
            2 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            @WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
            $endgroup$
            – nitsua60
            1 min ago















          1












          $begingroup$

          Yes, you can.



          The wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly by the spell.



          I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
            $endgroup$
            – William Mariager
            2 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            @WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
            $endgroup$
            – nitsua60
            1 min ago













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Yes, you can.



          The wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly by the spell.



          I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Yes, you can.



          The wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly by the spell.



          I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 41 mins ago









          MerudoMerudo

          515116




          515116











          • $begingroup$
            Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
            $endgroup$
            – William Mariager
            2 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            @WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
            $endgroup$
            – nitsua60
            1 min ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
            $endgroup$
            – William Mariager
            2 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            @WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
            $endgroup$
            – nitsua60
            1 min ago















          $begingroup$
          Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
          $endgroup$
          – William Mariager
          2 mins ago




          $begingroup$
          Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
          $endgroup$
          – William Mariager
          2 mins ago












          $begingroup$
          @WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
          $endgroup$
          – nitsua60
          1 min ago




          $begingroup$
          @WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
          $endgroup$
          – nitsua60
          1 min ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145493%2fcan-the-flaming-sphere-spell-be-rammed-into-multiple-tiny-creatures-that-are-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

          2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

          Metrô de Los Teques Índice Linhas | Estações | Ver também | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegação«INSTITUCIÓN»«Mapa de rutas»originalMetrô de Los TequesC.A. Metro Los Teques |Alcaldía de Guaicaipuro – Sitio OficialGobernacion de Mirandaeeeeeee