Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What repercussions would there be if the Trump Campaign was found to have links with Russia?Why would Mueller notify the White House that he wants to interview Spicer and Priebus?What exactly is “collusion”? What is Robert Mueller expected to prove?Did the US request that Russia extradite the 13 Russians charged by Mueller?Minority Democrat report from Senate Judiciary Committee says Russia funded the Trump campaign via the NRA; what does this mean for the NRA?Does CIA have an information line providing info on threats to the US for those without security clearance?How does the Mueller investigation compare with former investigations in terms of length of time, money spent, and indictments?Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?Did the IG’s office say its audit of the use of Confidential Human Sources was prompted by Trump?Did everyone named in the Mueller report get to read it in advance?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

What are the discoveries that have been possible with the rejection of positivism?

Why are vacuum tubes still used in amateur radios?

Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items

What makes a man succeed?

Is multiple magic items in one inherently imbalanced?

Why are my pictures showing a dark band on one edge?

What order were files/directories output in dir?

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

Why is it faster to reheat something than it is to cook it?

Sum letters are not two different

What initially awakened the Balrog?

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

Why we try to capture variability?

What is an "asse" in Elizabethan English?

What to do with repeated rejections for phd position

Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?

How to report t statistic from R

What is the difference between globalisation and imperialism?

The Nth Gryphon Number

Why can't I install Tomboy in Ubuntu Mate 19.04?

Co-worker has annoying ringtone

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?



Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What repercussions would there be if the Trump Campaign was found to have links with Russia?Why would Mueller notify the White House that he wants to interview Spicer and Priebus?What exactly is “collusion”? What is Robert Mueller expected to prove?Did the US request that Russia extradite the 13 Russians charged by Mueller?Minority Democrat report from Senate Judiciary Committee says Russia funded the Trump campaign via the NRA; what does this mean for the NRA?Does CIA have an information line providing info on threats to the US for those without security clearance?How does the Mueller investigation compare with former investigations in terms of length of time, money spent, and indictments?Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?Did the IG’s office say its audit of the use of Confidential Human Sources was prompted by Trump?Did everyone named in the Mueller report get to read it in advance?










3















According to the information contained in the Mueller Report, was there a conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russia? By conspiracy, I mean both the legal definition and in an informal sense; that is: did the Trump Campaign knowingly deal with Russian agents to gain an election advantage?



I'd like to keep this question focused only on the question of whether there was an actual conspiracy, not on obstruction of justice or other crimes that may have been uncovered. In addition, I'd like to focus on information contained in the Mueller Report, not on information from other sources.



Also, could citations be from the Mueller report instead of media conclusions about the report? I would like to keep out as many intermediaries as possible to reduce claims of bias.










share|improve this question
























  • You might want to ask about 'conspiracy' rather than 'collusion', indeed, the former is defined in law whereas the latter isn't. This is also argued on page 180 of the first volume of the report.

    – JJJ
    1 hour ago











  • good idea, I'll change that.

    – theresawalrus
    1 hour ago











  • @theresawalrus Feel free to rollback or edit my edit if you think they changed the meaning of the question

    – divibisan
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @divibisan Thanks for the edit, it states what I was asking much more clearly.

    – theresawalrus
    1 hour ago















3















According to the information contained in the Mueller Report, was there a conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russia? By conspiracy, I mean both the legal definition and in an informal sense; that is: did the Trump Campaign knowingly deal with Russian agents to gain an election advantage?



I'd like to keep this question focused only on the question of whether there was an actual conspiracy, not on obstruction of justice or other crimes that may have been uncovered. In addition, I'd like to focus on information contained in the Mueller Report, not on information from other sources.



Also, could citations be from the Mueller report instead of media conclusions about the report? I would like to keep out as many intermediaries as possible to reduce claims of bias.










share|improve this question
























  • You might want to ask about 'conspiracy' rather than 'collusion', indeed, the former is defined in law whereas the latter isn't. This is also argued on page 180 of the first volume of the report.

    – JJJ
    1 hour ago











  • good idea, I'll change that.

    – theresawalrus
    1 hour ago











  • @theresawalrus Feel free to rollback or edit my edit if you think they changed the meaning of the question

    – divibisan
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @divibisan Thanks for the edit, it states what I was asking much more clearly.

    – theresawalrus
    1 hour ago













3












3








3


1






According to the information contained in the Mueller Report, was there a conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russia? By conspiracy, I mean both the legal definition and in an informal sense; that is: did the Trump Campaign knowingly deal with Russian agents to gain an election advantage?



I'd like to keep this question focused only on the question of whether there was an actual conspiracy, not on obstruction of justice or other crimes that may have been uncovered. In addition, I'd like to focus on information contained in the Mueller Report, not on information from other sources.



Also, could citations be from the Mueller report instead of media conclusions about the report? I would like to keep out as many intermediaries as possible to reduce claims of bias.










share|improve this question
















According to the information contained in the Mueller Report, was there a conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russia? By conspiracy, I mean both the legal definition and in an informal sense; that is: did the Trump Campaign knowingly deal with Russian agents to gain an election advantage?



I'd like to keep this question focused only on the question of whether there was an actual conspiracy, not on obstruction of justice or other crimes that may have been uncovered. In addition, I'd like to focus on information contained in the Mueller Report, not on information from other sources.



Also, could citations be from the Mueller report instead of media conclusions about the report? I would like to keep out as many intermediaries as possible to reduce claims of bias.







united-states donald-trump mueller-investigation






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 26 mins ago









JJJ

6,98522558




6,98522558










asked 1 hour ago









theresawalrustheresawalrus

1186




1186












  • You might want to ask about 'conspiracy' rather than 'collusion', indeed, the former is defined in law whereas the latter isn't. This is also argued on page 180 of the first volume of the report.

    – JJJ
    1 hour ago











  • good idea, I'll change that.

    – theresawalrus
    1 hour ago











  • @theresawalrus Feel free to rollback or edit my edit if you think they changed the meaning of the question

    – divibisan
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @divibisan Thanks for the edit, it states what I was asking much more clearly.

    – theresawalrus
    1 hour ago

















  • You might want to ask about 'conspiracy' rather than 'collusion', indeed, the former is defined in law whereas the latter isn't. This is also argued on page 180 of the first volume of the report.

    – JJJ
    1 hour ago











  • good idea, I'll change that.

    – theresawalrus
    1 hour ago











  • @theresawalrus Feel free to rollback or edit my edit if you think they changed the meaning of the question

    – divibisan
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @divibisan Thanks for the edit, it states what I was asking much more clearly.

    – theresawalrus
    1 hour ago
















You might want to ask about 'conspiracy' rather than 'collusion', indeed, the former is defined in law whereas the latter isn't. This is also argued on page 180 of the first volume of the report.

– JJJ
1 hour ago





You might want to ask about 'conspiracy' rather than 'collusion', indeed, the former is defined in law whereas the latter isn't. This is also argued on page 180 of the first volume of the report.

– JJJ
1 hour ago













good idea, I'll change that.

– theresawalrus
1 hour ago





good idea, I'll change that.

– theresawalrus
1 hour ago













@theresawalrus Feel free to rollback or edit my edit if you think they changed the meaning of the question

– divibisan
1 hour ago





@theresawalrus Feel free to rollback or edit my edit if you think they changed the meaning of the question

– divibisan
1 hour ago




1




1





@divibisan Thanks for the edit, it states what I was asking much more clearly.

– theresawalrus
1 hour ago





@divibisan Thanks for the edit, it states what I was asking much more clearly.

– theresawalrus
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Regarding the legal definition, there was no conspiracy:




the report is very clear that Mueller’s investigation did not establish that the Trump campaign criminally conspired on illegal Russian election interference, or that it coordinated with Russia through either an active or tacit agreement.




Using your definition - knowingly deal with Russian agents to gain an election advantage - the matter is a bit less clear. Mueller 'uncovered “evidence of numerous links” between Donald Trump campaign officials and individuals with or claiming ties to the Russian government'. Eg:



  • 'Paul Manafort and Manafort’s deputy Rick Gates, were regularly providing polling information to a Russian national whom Gates believed to be a “spy.” [...] Manafort repeatedly met with Kilimnik, worked with him to develop a pro-Russian Ukraine policy that Trump could implement if elected'

  • '[In an attempt to find Clinton's emails] Flynn reached out to a man named Peter Smith who (apparently falsely) told a number of people that he was in contact with Russian agents.'

  • 'Donald Trump Jr. arranged a meeting with the express purpose of obtaining Russian “dirt” on Clinton, and [...] Papadopoulos was offered similar dirt from a Russian agent'

  • Trump publicly called on Russia to obtain Clinton's emails and "Within roughly five hours of Trump’s public request, Russian G.R.U. intelligence operatives targeted Clinton’s personal office for the first time".

  • 'Papadopoulos suggested that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information that would be damaging to Hillary Clinton'





share|improve this answer






























    1














    No, there was no conspiracy to the extent that criminal charges for conspiring with the Russians could be brought against members of the Trump campaign



    My answer is based on the quote below from the executive summary of the first volume of the Mueller report (page 9 of the first volume, page 17 in the linked pdf). In de report this constitutes one paragraph, but I split it in smaller chunks to improve readability.




    Second, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to
    the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was
    not sufficient to support criminal charges. Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to
    charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian
    principal.



    And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeaks’s releases of hacked
    materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation. Further, the evidence
    was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with
    representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election.







    share|improve this answer

























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "475"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40790%2fdoes-the-mueller-report-show-a-conspiracy-between-russia-and-the-trump-campaign%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      Regarding the legal definition, there was no conspiracy:




      the report is very clear that Mueller’s investigation did not establish that the Trump campaign criminally conspired on illegal Russian election interference, or that it coordinated with Russia through either an active or tacit agreement.




      Using your definition - knowingly deal with Russian agents to gain an election advantage - the matter is a bit less clear. Mueller 'uncovered “evidence of numerous links” between Donald Trump campaign officials and individuals with or claiming ties to the Russian government'. Eg:



      • 'Paul Manafort and Manafort’s deputy Rick Gates, were regularly providing polling information to a Russian national whom Gates believed to be a “spy.” [...] Manafort repeatedly met with Kilimnik, worked with him to develop a pro-Russian Ukraine policy that Trump could implement if elected'

      • '[In an attempt to find Clinton's emails] Flynn reached out to a man named Peter Smith who (apparently falsely) told a number of people that he was in contact with Russian agents.'

      • 'Donald Trump Jr. arranged a meeting with the express purpose of obtaining Russian “dirt” on Clinton, and [...] Papadopoulos was offered similar dirt from a Russian agent'

      • Trump publicly called on Russia to obtain Clinton's emails and "Within roughly five hours of Trump’s public request, Russian G.R.U. intelligence operatives targeted Clinton’s personal office for the first time".

      • 'Papadopoulos suggested that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information that would be damaging to Hillary Clinton'





      share|improve this answer



























        2














        Regarding the legal definition, there was no conspiracy:




        the report is very clear that Mueller’s investigation did not establish that the Trump campaign criminally conspired on illegal Russian election interference, or that it coordinated with Russia through either an active or tacit agreement.




        Using your definition - knowingly deal with Russian agents to gain an election advantage - the matter is a bit less clear. Mueller 'uncovered “evidence of numerous links” between Donald Trump campaign officials and individuals with or claiming ties to the Russian government'. Eg:



        • 'Paul Manafort and Manafort’s deputy Rick Gates, were regularly providing polling information to a Russian national whom Gates believed to be a “spy.” [...] Manafort repeatedly met with Kilimnik, worked with him to develop a pro-Russian Ukraine policy that Trump could implement if elected'

        • '[In an attempt to find Clinton's emails] Flynn reached out to a man named Peter Smith who (apparently falsely) told a number of people that he was in contact with Russian agents.'

        • 'Donald Trump Jr. arranged a meeting with the express purpose of obtaining Russian “dirt” on Clinton, and [...] Papadopoulos was offered similar dirt from a Russian agent'

        • Trump publicly called on Russia to obtain Clinton's emails and "Within roughly five hours of Trump’s public request, Russian G.R.U. intelligence operatives targeted Clinton’s personal office for the first time".

        • 'Papadopoulos suggested that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information that would be damaging to Hillary Clinton'





        share|improve this answer

























          2












          2








          2







          Regarding the legal definition, there was no conspiracy:




          the report is very clear that Mueller’s investigation did not establish that the Trump campaign criminally conspired on illegal Russian election interference, or that it coordinated with Russia through either an active or tacit agreement.




          Using your definition - knowingly deal with Russian agents to gain an election advantage - the matter is a bit less clear. Mueller 'uncovered “evidence of numerous links” between Donald Trump campaign officials and individuals with or claiming ties to the Russian government'. Eg:



          • 'Paul Manafort and Manafort’s deputy Rick Gates, were regularly providing polling information to a Russian national whom Gates believed to be a “spy.” [...] Manafort repeatedly met with Kilimnik, worked with him to develop a pro-Russian Ukraine policy that Trump could implement if elected'

          • '[In an attempt to find Clinton's emails] Flynn reached out to a man named Peter Smith who (apparently falsely) told a number of people that he was in contact with Russian agents.'

          • 'Donald Trump Jr. arranged a meeting with the express purpose of obtaining Russian “dirt” on Clinton, and [...] Papadopoulos was offered similar dirt from a Russian agent'

          • Trump publicly called on Russia to obtain Clinton's emails and "Within roughly five hours of Trump’s public request, Russian G.R.U. intelligence operatives targeted Clinton’s personal office for the first time".

          • 'Papadopoulos suggested that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information that would be damaging to Hillary Clinton'





          share|improve this answer













          Regarding the legal definition, there was no conspiracy:




          the report is very clear that Mueller’s investigation did not establish that the Trump campaign criminally conspired on illegal Russian election interference, or that it coordinated with Russia through either an active or tacit agreement.




          Using your definition - knowingly deal with Russian agents to gain an election advantage - the matter is a bit less clear. Mueller 'uncovered “evidence of numerous links” between Donald Trump campaign officials and individuals with or claiming ties to the Russian government'. Eg:



          • 'Paul Manafort and Manafort’s deputy Rick Gates, were regularly providing polling information to a Russian national whom Gates believed to be a “spy.” [...] Manafort repeatedly met with Kilimnik, worked with him to develop a pro-Russian Ukraine policy that Trump could implement if elected'

          • '[In an attempt to find Clinton's emails] Flynn reached out to a man named Peter Smith who (apparently falsely) told a number of people that he was in contact with Russian agents.'

          • 'Donald Trump Jr. arranged a meeting with the express purpose of obtaining Russian “dirt” on Clinton, and [...] Papadopoulos was offered similar dirt from a Russian agent'

          • Trump publicly called on Russia to obtain Clinton's emails and "Within roughly five hours of Trump’s public request, Russian G.R.U. intelligence operatives targeted Clinton’s personal office for the first time".

          • 'Papadopoulos suggested that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information that would be damaging to Hillary Clinton'






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 34 mins ago









          timtim

          18.9k114983




          18.9k114983





















              1














              No, there was no conspiracy to the extent that criminal charges for conspiring with the Russians could be brought against members of the Trump campaign



              My answer is based on the quote below from the executive summary of the first volume of the Mueller report (page 9 of the first volume, page 17 in the linked pdf). In de report this constitutes one paragraph, but I split it in smaller chunks to improve readability.




              Second, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to
              the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was
              not sufficient to support criminal charges. Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to
              charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian
              principal.



              And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeaks’s releases of hacked
              materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation. Further, the evidence
              was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with
              representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election.







              share|improve this answer





























                1














                No, there was no conspiracy to the extent that criminal charges for conspiring with the Russians could be brought against members of the Trump campaign



                My answer is based on the quote below from the executive summary of the first volume of the Mueller report (page 9 of the first volume, page 17 in the linked pdf). In de report this constitutes one paragraph, but I split it in smaller chunks to improve readability.




                Second, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to
                the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was
                not sufficient to support criminal charges. Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to
                charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian
                principal.



                And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeaks’s releases of hacked
                materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation. Further, the evidence
                was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with
                representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election.







                share|improve this answer



























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  No, there was no conspiracy to the extent that criminal charges for conspiring with the Russians could be brought against members of the Trump campaign



                  My answer is based on the quote below from the executive summary of the first volume of the Mueller report (page 9 of the first volume, page 17 in the linked pdf). In de report this constitutes one paragraph, but I split it in smaller chunks to improve readability.




                  Second, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to
                  the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was
                  not sufficient to support criminal charges. Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to
                  charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian
                  principal.



                  And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeaks’s releases of hacked
                  materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation. Further, the evidence
                  was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with
                  representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election.







                  share|improve this answer















                  No, there was no conspiracy to the extent that criminal charges for conspiring with the Russians could be brought against members of the Trump campaign



                  My answer is based on the quote below from the executive summary of the first volume of the Mueller report (page 9 of the first volume, page 17 in the linked pdf). In de report this constitutes one paragraph, but I split it in smaller chunks to improve readability.




                  Second, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to
                  the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was
                  not sufficient to support criminal charges. Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to
                  charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian
                  principal.



                  And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeaks’s releases of hacked
                  materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation. Further, the evidence
                  was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with
                  representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election.








                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 27 mins ago

























                  answered 40 mins ago









                  JJJJJJ

                  6,98522558




                  6,98522558



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40790%2fdoes-the-mueller-report-show-a-conspiracy-between-russia-and-the-trump-campaign%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

                      2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

                      Mortes em março de 2019 Referências Menu de navegação«Zhores Alferov, Nobel de Física bielorrusso, morre aos 88 anos - Ciência»«Fallece Rafael Torija, o bispo emérito de Ciudad Real»«Peter Hurford dies at 88»«Keith Flint, vocalista do The Prodigy, morre aos 49 anos»«Luke Perry, ator de 'Barrados no baile' e 'Riverdale', morre aos 52 anos»«Former Rangers and Scotland captain Eric Caldow dies, aged 84»«Morreu, aos 61 anos, a antiga lenda do wrestling King Kong Bundy»«Fallece el actor y director teatral Abraham Stavans»«In Memoriam Guillaume Faye»«Sidney Sheinberg, a Force Behind Universal and Spielberg, Is Dead at 84»«Carmine Persico, Colombo Crime Family Boss, Is Dead at 85»«Dirigent Michael Gielen gestorben»«Ciclista tricampeã mundial e prata na Rio 2016 é encontrada morta em casa aos 23 anos»«Pagan Community Notes: Raven Grimassi dies, Indianapolis pop-up event cancelled, Circle Sanctuary announces new podcast, and more!»«Hal Blaine, Wrecking Crew Drummer, Dies at 90»«Morre Coutinho, que editou dupla lendária com Pelé no Santos»«Cantor Demétrius, ídolo da Jovem Guarda, morre em SP»«Ex-presidente do Vasco, Eurico Miranda morre no Rio de Janeiro»«Bronze no Mundial de basquete de 1971, Laís Elena morre aos 76 anos»«Diretor de Corridas da F1, Charlie Whiting morre aos 66 anos às vésperas do GP da Austrália»«Morreu o cardeal Danneels, da Bélgica»«Morreu o cartoonista Augusto Cid»«Morreu a atriz Maria Isabel de Lizandra, de "Vale Tudo" e novelas da Tupi»«WS Merwin, prize-winning poet of nature, dies at 91»«Atriz Márcia Real morre em São Paulo aos 88 anos»«Mauritanie: décès de l'ancien président Mohamed Mahmoud ould Louly»«Morreu Dick Dale, o rei da surf guitar e de "Pulp Fiction"»«Falleció Víctor Genes»«João Carlos Marinho, autor de 'O Gênio do Crime', morre em SP»«Legendary Horror Director and SFX Artist John Carl Buechler Dies at 66»«Morre em Salvador a religiosa Makota Valdina»«مرگ بازیکن‌ سابق نساجی بر اثر سقوط سنگ در مازندران»«Domingos Oliveira morre no Rio»«Morre Airton Ravagniani, ex-São Paulo, Fla, Vasco, Grêmio e Sport - Notícias»«Morre o escritor Flavio Moreira da Costa»«Larry Cohen, Writer-Director of 'It's Alive' and 'Hell Up in Harlem,' Dies at 77»«Scott Walker, experimental singer-songwriter, dead at 76»«Joseph Pilato, Day of the Dead Star and Horror Favorite, Dies at 70»«Sheffield United set to pay tribute to legendary goalkeeper Ted Burgin who has died at 91»«Morre Rafael Henzel, sobrevivente de acidente aéreo da Chapecoense»«Morre Valery Bykovsky, um dos primeiros cosmonautas da União Soviética»«Agnès Varda, cineasta da Nouvelle Vague, morre aos 90 anos»«Agnès Varda, cineasta francesa, morre aos 90 anos»«Tania Mallet, James Bond Actress and Helen Mirren's Cousin, Dies at 77»e