Why's A's expected profit $.04? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Multi tool use
What initially awakened the Balrog?
One-one communication
Unit testing extension method adding view location expander
What is Adi Shankara referring to when he says "He has Vajra marks on his feet"?
A letter with no particular backstory
How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?
Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?
Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?
Drawing spherical mirrors
What is the meaning of 'breadth' in breadth first search?
What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思？
Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign?
How many morphisms from 1 to 1+1 can there be?
Did Mueller's report provide an evidentiary basis for the claim of Russian govt election interference via social media?
How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?
Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?
What to do with repeated rejections for phd position
Induction Proof for Sequences
What is the home of the drow in Flanaess?
Sentence with dass with three Verbs (One modal and two connected with zu)
How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics
How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?
Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?
How would a mousetrap for use in space work?
Why's A's expected profit $.04?
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Paul Davies. JC Smith's The Law of Contract (2018 2 ed). p. 6.
On a slightly different tack, but in a similar vein, Judge Richard Posner has written:17
Suppose I sign a contract to deliver 100,000 custom-ground widgets at $.10 apiece to A, for use
in his boiler factory. Afer I have delivered 10,000, B comes to me, explains that he desperately
needs 25,000 custom-ground widgets at once since otherwise he will be forced to close his pianola factory at great cost, and offers me $.15 apiece for 25,000 widgets. I sell him the widgets
and as a result do not complete timely delivery to A, who sustains $1000 in damages from my
breach. Having obtained an additional proft of $1250 on the sale to B, I am better off even
afer reimbursing A for his loss. Society is also better off. Since B was willing to pay me $.15
per widget, it must mean that each widget was worth at least $.15 to him. But it was worth only
$.14 to A—$.10, what he paid, plus $.04 ($1000 divided by 25,000), his expected proft. Tus the
breach resulted in a transfer of the 25,000 widgets from a lower valued to a higher valued use.
17 R Posner, Economic Analysis of the Law (8th edn, Aspen, 2011) 151.
Pls see the emboldenings. Whence did the $1000 hail?
Whence did the 25000 hail? This is B's quantity demanded, not A?
contract-law
asked 9 mins ago
AntinatalistAntinatalist
101
New contributor
Antinatalist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Paul Davies. JC Smith's The Law of Contract (2018 2 ed). p. 6.
On a slightly different tack, but in a similar vein, Judge Richard Posner has written:17
Suppose I sign a contract to deliver 100,000 custom-ground widgets at $.10 apiece to A, for use
in his boiler factory. Afer I have delivered 10,000, B comes to me, explains that he desperately
needs 25,000 custom-ground widgets at once since otherwise he will be forced to close his pianola factory at great cost, and offers me $.15 apiece for 25,000 widgets. I sell him the widgets
and as a result do not complete timely delivery to A, who sustains $1000 in damages from my
breach. Having obtained an additional proft of $1250 on the sale to B, I am better off even
afer reimbursing A for his loss. Society is also better off. Since B was willing to pay me $.15
per widget, it must mean that each widget was worth at least $.15 to him. But it was worth only
$.14 to A—$.10, what he paid, plus $.04 ($1000 divided by 25,000), his expected proft. Tus the
breach resulted in a transfer of the 25,000 widgets from a lower valued to a higher valued use.
17 R Posner, Economic Analysis of the Law (8th edn, Aspen, 2011) 151.
Pls see the emboldenings. Whence did the $1000 hail?
Whence did the 25000 hail? This is B's quantity demanded, not A?
contract-law
asked 9 mins ago
AntinatalistAntinatalist
101
New contributor
Antinatalist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Paul Davies. JC Smith's The Law of Contract (2018 2 ed). p. 6.
On a slightly different tack, but in a similar vein, Judge Richard Posner has written:17
Suppose I sign a contract to deliver 100,000 custom-ground widgets at $.10 apiece to A, for use
in his boiler factory. Afer I have delivered 10,000, B comes to me, explains that he desperately
needs 25,000 custom-ground widgets at once since otherwise he will be forced to close his pianola factory at great cost, and offers me $.15 apiece for 25,000 widgets. I sell him the widgets
and as a result do not complete timely delivery to A, who sustains $1000 in damages from my
breach. Having obtained an additional proft of $1250 on the sale to B, I am better off even
afer reimbursing A for his loss. Society is also better off. Since B was willing to pay me $.15
per widget, it must mean that each widget was worth at least $.15 to him. But it was worth only
$.14 to A—$.10, what he paid, plus $.04 ($1000 divided by 25,000), his expected proft. Tus the
breach resulted in a transfer of the 25,000 widgets from a lower valued to a higher valued use.
17 R Posner, Economic Analysis of the Law (8th edn, Aspen, 2011) 151.
Pls see the emboldenings. Whence did the $1000 hail?
Whence did the 25000 hail? This is B's quantity demanded, not A?
contract-law
asked 9 mins ago
AntinatalistAntinatalist
101
New contributor
Antinatalist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Paul Davies. JC Smith's The Law of Contract (2018 2 ed). p. 6.
On a slightly different tack, but in a similar vein, Judge Richard Posner has written:17
Suppose I sign a contract to deliver 100,000 custom-ground widgets at $.10 apiece to A, for use
in his boiler factory. Afer I have delivered 10,000, B comes to me, explains that he desperately
needs 25,000 custom-ground widgets at once since otherwise he will be forced to close his pianola factory at great cost, and offers me $.15 apiece for 25,000 widgets. I sell him the widgets
and as a result do not complete timely delivery to A, who sustains $1000 in damages from my
breach. Having obtained an additional proft of $1250 on the sale to B, I am better off even
afer reimbursing A for his loss. Society is also better off. Since B was willing to pay me $.15
per widget, it must mean that each widget was worth at least $.15 to him. But it was worth only
$.14 to A—$.10, what he paid, plus $.04 ($1000 divided by 25,000), his expected proft. Tus the
breach resulted in a transfer of the 25,000 widgets from a lower valued to a higher valued use.
17 R Posner, Economic Analysis of the Law (8th edn, Aspen, 2011) 151.
Pls see the emboldenings. Whence did the $1000 hail?
Whence did the 25000 hail? This is B's quantity demanded, not A?
contract-law
contract-law
asked 9 mins ago
AntinatalistAntinatalist
101
New contributor
Antinatalist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 mins ago
AntinatalistAntinatalist
101
New contributor
Antinatalist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 mins ago
AntinatalistAntinatalist
101
New contributor
Antinatalist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 mins ago
AntinatalistAntinatalist
101
asked 9 mins ago
AntinatalistAntinatalist
101
101
New contributor
Antinatalist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Antinatalist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Antinatalist is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Antinatalist is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39256%2fwhys-as-expected-profit-04%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Antinatalist is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Antinatalist is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Antinatalist is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Antinatalist is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39256%2fwhys-as-expected-profit-04%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
rhzb1LVnPg,ZntzU yJrKXwk mE06vqVfkDRmlZBzq9rbLx 4 Qc
