Does releasing a work into the public domain disclaim any warrants?Does the WTFPL legally disclaim warranties?Why does this mention the U.S.?Does being Public Domain absolve the author/creator of liability?How can I release a work into the public domain?Has The Unlicense any legal value?Is a photo that is in the public domain in US also in the public domain in other countries?How does public domain work?Are “slavish copies” of public domain work in the public domain?Data copyright for public domain content or natural resourcesDo individual programmers expose themselves to liability risks when they make their programs available to the public?
What's the in-universe reasoning behind sorcerers needing material components?
How dangerous is XSS?
What mechanic is there to disable a threat instead of killing it?
Do scales need to be in alphabetical order?
How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?
Bullying boss launched a smear campaign and made me unemployable
Little known, relatively unlikely, but scientifically plausible, apocalyptic (or near apocalyptic) events
How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?
What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?
Solving a recurrence relation (poker chips)
How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?
How can I determine if the org that I'm currently connected to is a scratch org?
Should I cover my bicycle overnight while bikepacking?
How do I know where to place holes on an instrument?
Im going to France and my passport expires June 19th
Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?
GFCI outlets - can they be repaired? Are they really needed at the end of a circuit?
Ambiguity in the definition of entropy
Expand and Contract
What exploit are these user agents trying to use?
Why no variance term in Bayesian logistic regression?
Size of subfigure fitting its content (tikzpicture)
Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?
Why is this clock signal connected to a capacitor to gnd?
Does releasing a work into the public domain disclaim any warrants?
Does the WTFPL legally disclaim warranties?Why does this mention the U.S.?Does being Public Domain absolve the author/creator of liability?How can I release a work into the public domain?Has The Unlicense any legal value?Is a photo that is in the public domain in US also in the public domain in other countries?How does public domain work?Are “slavish copies” of public domain work in the public domain?Data copyright for public domain content or natural resourcesDo individual programmers expose themselves to liability risks when they make their programs available to the public?
My understanding is that the releasing statement assigns "ownership" of the work to the public at large. But obviously one could not sue "the public" if (say) PD software crashed due to a defect and cost one's business a day's salary of a software engineer to clean it up.
So does releasing a work into the public domain disclaim any liability? And if not, why not?
liability public-domain
add a comment |
My understanding is that the releasing statement assigns "ownership" of the work to the public at large. But obviously one could not sue "the public" if (say) PD software crashed due to a defect and cost one's business a day's salary of a software engineer to clean it up.
So does releasing a work into the public domain disclaim any liability? And if not, why not?
liability public-domain
Do you specifically mean "merchantability" as opposed to "liability"?
– user6726
Jul 7 '17 at 14:59
I guess I did mean liability in a broad sense; or perhaps, web-searching it now, "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closest? Basically, should someone have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:10
add a comment |
My understanding is that the releasing statement assigns "ownership" of the work to the public at large. But obviously one could not sue "the public" if (say) PD software crashed due to a defect and cost one's business a day's salary of a software engineer to clean it up.
So does releasing a work into the public domain disclaim any liability? And if not, why not?
liability public-domain
My understanding is that the releasing statement assigns "ownership" of the work to the public at large. But obviously one could not sue "the public" if (say) PD software crashed due to a defect and cost one's business a day's salary of a software engineer to clean it up.
So does releasing a work into the public domain disclaim any liability? And if not, why not?
liability public-domain
liability public-domain
edited 38 mins ago
Nij
2,10931326
2,10931326
asked Jul 7 '17 at 7:01
Arlo James BarnesArlo James Barnes
33
33
Do you specifically mean "merchantability" as opposed to "liability"?
– user6726
Jul 7 '17 at 14:59
I guess I did mean liability in a broad sense; or perhaps, web-searching it now, "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closest? Basically, should someone have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:10
add a comment |
Do you specifically mean "merchantability" as opposed to "liability"?
– user6726
Jul 7 '17 at 14:59
I guess I did mean liability in a broad sense; or perhaps, web-searching it now, "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closest? Basically, should someone have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:10
Do you specifically mean "merchantability" as opposed to "liability"?
– user6726
Jul 7 '17 at 14:59
Do you specifically mean "merchantability" as opposed to "liability"?
– user6726
Jul 7 '17 at 14:59
I guess I did mean liability in a broad sense; or perhaps, web-searching it now, "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closest? Basically, should someone have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:10
I guess I did mean liability in a broad sense; or perhaps, web-searching it now, "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closest? Basically, should someone have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:10
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
"Merchantability" is only a concept that has meaning if you sell something. If you give something away you make no warranty as to its quality.
Thanks, I realise I had a misunderstanding about the word "merchantability". My question was orthogonal to whether it was being sold (PD works can be sold, see freepd.com for instance; it is basically selling convenience since the actual market of the product cannot be defended by copyright law. But that does raise the question of whether actual merchantability would come into play in such cases... ). I really was curious about whether someone should have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function. Perhaps "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closer?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:15
Again "fitness for purpose" requires a contractural arrangement
– Dale M
Jul 7 '17 at 23:14
Ah, okay. I see.
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 8 '17 at 23:31
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f20049%2fdoes-releasing-a-work-into-the-public-domain-disclaim-any-warrants%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
"Merchantability" is only a concept that has meaning if you sell something. If you give something away you make no warranty as to its quality.
Thanks, I realise I had a misunderstanding about the word "merchantability". My question was orthogonal to whether it was being sold (PD works can be sold, see freepd.com for instance; it is basically selling convenience since the actual market of the product cannot be defended by copyright law. But that does raise the question of whether actual merchantability would come into play in such cases... ). I really was curious about whether someone should have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function. Perhaps "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closer?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:15
Again "fitness for purpose" requires a contractural arrangement
– Dale M
Jul 7 '17 at 23:14
Ah, okay. I see.
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 8 '17 at 23:31
add a comment |
"Merchantability" is only a concept that has meaning if you sell something. If you give something away you make no warranty as to its quality.
Thanks, I realise I had a misunderstanding about the word "merchantability". My question was orthogonal to whether it was being sold (PD works can be sold, see freepd.com for instance; it is basically selling convenience since the actual market of the product cannot be defended by copyright law. But that does raise the question of whether actual merchantability would come into play in such cases... ). I really was curious about whether someone should have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function. Perhaps "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closer?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:15
Again "fitness for purpose" requires a contractural arrangement
– Dale M
Jul 7 '17 at 23:14
Ah, okay. I see.
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 8 '17 at 23:31
add a comment |
"Merchantability" is only a concept that has meaning if you sell something. If you give something away you make no warranty as to its quality.
"Merchantability" is only a concept that has meaning if you sell something. If you give something away you make no warranty as to its quality.
answered Jul 7 '17 at 10:19
Dale MDale M
56k23579
56k23579
Thanks, I realise I had a misunderstanding about the word "merchantability". My question was orthogonal to whether it was being sold (PD works can be sold, see freepd.com for instance; it is basically selling convenience since the actual market of the product cannot be defended by copyright law. But that does raise the question of whether actual merchantability would come into play in such cases... ). I really was curious about whether someone should have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function. Perhaps "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closer?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:15
Again "fitness for purpose" requires a contractural arrangement
– Dale M
Jul 7 '17 at 23:14
Ah, okay. I see.
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 8 '17 at 23:31
add a comment |
Thanks, I realise I had a misunderstanding about the word "merchantability". My question was orthogonal to whether it was being sold (PD works can be sold, see freepd.com for instance; it is basically selling convenience since the actual market of the product cannot be defended by copyright law. But that does raise the question of whether actual merchantability would come into play in such cases... ). I really was curious about whether someone should have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function. Perhaps "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closer?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:15
Again "fitness for purpose" requires a contractural arrangement
– Dale M
Jul 7 '17 at 23:14
Ah, okay. I see.
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 8 '17 at 23:31
Thanks, I realise I had a misunderstanding about the word "merchantability". My question was orthogonal to whether it was being sold (PD works can be sold, see freepd.com for instance; it is basically selling convenience since the actual market of the product cannot be defended by copyright law. But that does raise the question of whether actual merchantability would come into play in such cases... ). I really was curious about whether someone should have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function. Perhaps "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closer?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:15
Thanks, I realise I had a misunderstanding about the word "merchantability". My question was orthogonal to whether it was being sold (PD works can be sold, see freepd.com for instance; it is basically selling convenience since the actual market of the product cannot be defended by copyright law. But that does raise the question of whether actual merchantability would come into play in such cases... ). I really was curious about whether someone should have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function. Perhaps "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closer?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:15
Again "fitness for purpose" requires a contractural arrangement
– Dale M
Jul 7 '17 at 23:14
Again "fitness for purpose" requires a contractural arrangement
– Dale M
Jul 7 '17 at 23:14
Ah, okay. I see.
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 8 '17 at 23:31
Ah, okay. I see.
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 8 '17 at 23:31
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f20049%2fdoes-releasing-a-work-into-the-public-domain-disclaim-any-warrants%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do you specifically mean "merchantability" as opposed to "liability"?
– user6726
Jul 7 '17 at 14:59
I guess I did mean liability in a broad sense; or perhaps, web-searching it now, "fitness for a particular purpose" might be closest? Basically, should someone have a reasonable expectation of a work performing a certain function?
– Arlo James Barnes
Jul 7 '17 at 20:10